Comparison Overview

FASANA

VS

SG

FASANA

Adolf-Halstrick Straße 6, Euskirchen, 53881, DE
Last Update: 2026-01-24
Between 700 and 749

Seit über 100 Jahren produzieren wir an unserem Standort in Stotzheim Tissue Produkte für den schön gedeckten Tisch. Wir bieten „alles unter einem Dach“ von der Tissue Herstellung auf unserer eigenen Papiermaschine bis hin zum fertig konfektionierten Produkt für den Consumer und Großverbraucher. For more than 100 years we have been producing tissue products for beautiful table settings at our location in Stotzheim. We offer ‘everything under one umbrella’ – from tissue production on our own paper machine to the finished product for the consumer and bulk consumer.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 81
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

SG

None
Last Update: 2026-01-04
Between 750 and 799

SG - SG - SG - SG - TestSG - SG - SG - SG - Test SG - SG - SG - SG - TestSG - SG - SG - SG - Test SG - SG - SG - SG - TestSG - SG - SG - SG - Test

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fasana-gmbh.jpeg
FASANA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/segezha-group.jpeg
SG
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FASANA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SG
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Paper & Forest Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FASANA in 2026.

Incidents vs Paper & Forest Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SG in 2026.

Incident History — FASANA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FASANA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fasana-gmbh.jpeg
FASANA
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/segezha-group.jpeg
SG
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SG company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to FASANA company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

FASANA company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas SG company has not reported any.

In the current year, SG company and FASANA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SG company nor FASANA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SG company nor FASANA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

FASANA company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while SG company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither FASANA company nor SG company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FASANA nor SG holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither FASANA company nor SG company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

SG company employs more people globally than FASANA company, reflecting its scale as a Paper & Forest Products.

Neither FASANA nor SG holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FASANA nor SG holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FASANA nor SG holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FASANA nor SG holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FASANA nor SG holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FASANA nor SG holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.