Comparison Overview

Farrow-Gillespie Heath Wilmoth LLP

VS

Oasis Legal Services

Farrow-Gillespie Heath Wilmoth LLP

1700 Pacific Avenue, Dallas, TX, 75201, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The certified woman-owned law firm of Farrow-Gillespie Heath Wilmoth LLP provides a full range of legal services to businesses and individuals. Located in downtown Dallas, Texas, the firm is rated AV®Preeminent, the highest rating given to law firms. The award-winning attorneys at FGHW serve businesses from start-ups to the Fortune 500 in the areas of employment law and litigation, business formation and transactions, contracts, commercial litigation, advertising and promotions law, personal injury litigation defense, commercial real estate, and health care law. For individuals, FGHW attorneys provide all legal services in the areas of estate planning & probate, probate litigation, adoption, and elder law. For more information, call 214-361-5600 or email [email protected].

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Oasis Legal Services

1330 Broadway, Oakland, California, 94612, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Oasis Legal Services proudly provides quality legal immigration services to under-represented, low-income groups with a focus on LGBTQIA+ communities. By acknowledging, respecting, and honoring their struggles, we empower immigrants so that dignity grows and integrity blooms. We have over 35 years of professional experience combined in immigration legal services for the LGBTQIA+ community, and we've helped over 700 LGBTQIA+ immigrants obtain asylum in the United States, with a 98% success rate in obtaining asylum for our clients. We are an independent non-profit 501(c)3 organization, and are not affiliated with or funded by the US government.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/farrow-gillespie-&-heath-llp.jpeg
Farrow-Gillespie Heath Wilmoth LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Farrow-Gillespie Heath Wilmoth LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Oasis Legal Services
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Farrow-Gillespie Heath Wilmoth LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Oasis Legal Services in 2025.

Incident History — Farrow-Gillespie Heath Wilmoth LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Farrow-Gillespie Heath Wilmoth LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Oasis Legal Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Oasis Legal Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/farrow-gillespie-&-heath-llp.jpeg
Farrow-Gillespie Heath Wilmoth LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oasis-legal-services.jpeg
Oasis Legal Services
Incidents

FAQ

Farrow-Gillespie Heath Wilmoth LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Oasis Legal Services company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Oasis Legal Services company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Farrow-Gillespie Heath Wilmoth LLP company.

In the current year, Oasis Legal Services company and Farrow-Gillespie Heath Wilmoth LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Oasis Legal Services company nor Farrow-Gillespie Heath Wilmoth LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Oasis Legal Services company nor Farrow-Gillespie Heath Wilmoth LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Oasis Legal Services company nor Farrow-Gillespie Heath Wilmoth LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Farrow-Gillespie Heath Wilmoth LLP company nor Oasis Legal Services company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Farrow-Gillespie Heath Wilmoth LLP nor Oasis Legal Services holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Farrow-Gillespie Heath Wilmoth LLP company nor Oasis Legal Services company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Farrow-Gillespie Heath Wilmoth LLP company employs more people globally than Oasis Legal Services company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Farrow-Gillespie Heath Wilmoth LLP nor Oasis Legal Services holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Farrow-Gillespie Heath Wilmoth LLP nor Oasis Legal Services holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Farrow-Gillespie Heath Wilmoth LLP nor Oasis Legal Services holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Farrow-Gillespie Heath Wilmoth LLP nor Oasis Legal Services holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Farrow-Gillespie Heath Wilmoth LLP nor Oasis Legal Services holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Farrow-Gillespie Heath Wilmoth LLP nor Oasis Legal Services holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X