Comparison Overview

F•A•R•O• Consultancy

VS

NeoLaw

F•A•R•O• Consultancy

None, None, Panama City, Panamá, PA, None
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

We provide top-notch service to help niche clients achieve the needs related to their legacy, corporate and private advisory, tax planning, management and administration. We are a boutique consultancy firm with a strong international focus. Our consultancy capabilities are built on the expertise of our in-house professionals which are located in Panama City, Dubai and Lugano (Switzerland) and a hand-picked network of partners. We included under one new brand the variety of services we have created throughout the years with different locations. Brico Law Firm, Jesed Law Firm and Jesed International Services DMCC have merged into FARO CONSULTANCY.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

NeoLaw

30-34 Curtain Road, London, EC2A 3NZ, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

NeoLaw is a full-service, commercially focused legal practice delivering professional, effective legal services for corporate and blue chip enterprises, SMEs and community organisations. Our team of expert lawyers add measurable value, delivering innovative solutions to your commercial legal issues - from the complex to the esoteric. Our legal professionals’ technical knowledge and proven expertise ensures we deliver successful outcomes for our enterprise clients. We are approachable and listen well, delivering where others do not by ensuring we fully understand your objectives and retain a clear focus on delivering results against that agenda. We are aware that in today’s challenging economic climate cost of service is always an issue. We offer tailored and flexible approaches to our engagement, always finding a positive and practical payment model. The results speak for themselves - our success rate over the years has resulted in NeoLaw developing long lasting and trusted working relationships with business clients of all sizes. With our teams’ in excess of 25 years’ experience in delivering legal services for business, we are confident that we can provide the legal support that your enterprise needs.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/faro-consultancy.jpeg
F•A•R•O• Consultancy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neolaw.jpeg
NeoLaw
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
F•A•R•O• Consultancy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NeoLaw
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for F•A•R•O• Consultancy in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NeoLaw in 2025.

Incident History — F•A•R•O• Consultancy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

F•A•R•O• Consultancy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NeoLaw (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NeoLaw cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/faro-consultancy.jpeg
F•A•R•O• Consultancy
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neolaw.jpeg
NeoLaw
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

NeoLaw company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to F•A•R•O• Consultancy company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, NeoLaw company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to F•A•R•O• Consultancy company.

In the current year, NeoLaw company and F•A•R•O• Consultancy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither NeoLaw company nor F•A•R•O• Consultancy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither NeoLaw company nor F•A•R•O• Consultancy company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither NeoLaw company nor F•A•R•O• Consultancy company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither F•A•R•O• Consultancy company nor NeoLaw company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither F•A•R•O• Consultancy nor NeoLaw holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither F•A•R•O• Consultancy company nor NeoLaw company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

F•A•R•O• Consultancy company employs more people globally than NeoLaw company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither F•A•R•O• Consultancy nor NeoLaw holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither F•A•R•O• Consultancy nor NeoLaw holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither F•A•R•O• Consultancy nor NeoLaw holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither F•A•R•O• Consultancy nor NeoLaw holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither F•A•R•O• Consultancy nor NeoLaw holds HIPAA certification.

Neither F•A•R•O• Consultancy nor NeoLaw holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X