Comparison Overview

Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site

VS

PAV

Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site

14520 River Rd, Plano, Illinois, 60545, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://edithfarnsworthhouse.org/

Designed by Mies van der Rohe in 1945 and constructed in 1951, the Farnsworth House is a vital part of American iconography, an exemplary representation of both the International Style of architecture as well as the modern movement’s desire to juxtapose the sleek, streamline design of Modern structure with the organic environment of the surrounding nature. Mies constructed this glass box residence of “almost nothing” for Dr. Edith Farnsworth as a country retreat along the Fox River in Plano, IL. It continued to be a private residence for over 50 years until Landmarks Illinois and the National Trust for Historic Preservation purchased it in 2003. Today it is owned and managed by the Trust and the site is open as a public museum. See what's happening - https://linktr.ee/farnsworthhouse

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

PAV

US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 800 and 849
http://www.parcoartevivente.it

A museum of contemporary art especially dedicated to the living art, exploring the relation between at and nature, art and science, in a truely ecological sense. PAV is a little, eco-sustainable museum with exposition rooms and a laboratory, encircled by green park enriched by permanent and temporary artworks (from landart to landscaping). The PAV art program and the educational work are closely related, involving artistic research, collective activities, publishing, and so on.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 75
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/farnsworth-house.jpeg
Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
PAV
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PAV
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PAV in 2026.

Incident History — Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PAV (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PAV cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/farnsworth-house.jpeg
Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
PAV
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PAV company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, PAV company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site company.

In the current year, PAV company and Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PAV company nor Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PAV company nor Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PAV company nor Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site company nor PAV company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site nor PAV holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site company nor PAV company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

PAV company employs more people globally than Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site nor PAV holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site nor PAV holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site nor PAV holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site nor PAV holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site nor PAV holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site nor PAV holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

The WP Go Maps (formerly WP Google Maps) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the processBackgroundAction() function in all versions up to, and including, 10.0.04. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to modify global map engine settings.

Published
Date
2026-01-24
Updated
Date
2026-01-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The Save as PDF Plugin by PDFCrowd plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘options’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. NOTE: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires that the PDFCrowd API key is blank (also known as "demo mode", which is the default configuration when the plugin is installed) or known.

Published
Date
2026-01-24
Updated
Date
2026-01-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The Hustle – Email Marketing, Lead Generation, Optins, Popups plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to incorrect file type validation in the action_import_module() function in all versions up to, and including, 7.8.9.2. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with a lower-privileged role (e.g., Subscriber-level access and above), to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible. Successful exploitation requires an admin to grant Hustle module permissions (or module edit access) to the low-privileged user so they can access the Hustle admin page and obtain the required nonce.

Published
Date
2026-01-24
Updated
Date
2026-01-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

The WP Directory Kit plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.9 via the wdk_public_action AJAX handler. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract email addresses for users with Directory Kit-specific user roles.

Published
Date
2026-01-24
Updated
Date
2026-01-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

The Meta-box GalleryMeta plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via admin settings in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with editor-level permissions and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This only affects multi-site installations and installations where unfiltered_html has been disabled.

Published
Date
2026-01-24
Updated
Date
2026-01-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References