Comparison Overview

Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site

VS

Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art

Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site

14520 River Rd, Plano, Illinois, 60545, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Designed by Mies van der Rohe in 1945 and constructed in 1951, the Farnsworth House is a vital part of American iconography, an exemplary representation of both the International Style of architecture as well as the modern movement’s desire to juxtapose the sleek, streamline design of Modern structure with the organic environment of the surrounding nature. Mies constructed this glass box residence of “almost nothing” for Dr. Edith Farnsworth as a country retreat along the Fox River in Plano, IL. It continued to be a private residence for over 50 years until Landmarks Illinois and the National Trust for Historic Preservation purchased it in 2003. Today it is owned and managed by the Trust and the site is open as a public museum. See what's happening - https://linktr.ee/farnsworthhouse

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art

176 Water Company Road, Millersburg, PA, 17061, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

"Seeing is more than merely looking, it involves noticing things" - Ned Smith The mission of the Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art is to honor the legacy of Ned Smith by merging the arts and natural world through education, exhibition, and experiences. Rooted in the scenic Susquehanna Valley of Central Pennsylvania, we strive to be the leading institution for the collection and dissemination of art and natural history knowledge, particularly when the two intersect and reinforce one another. We are the repository for the art, writings and other work of the late Ned Smith, from whose life the center takes its original inspiration. The center seeks to appeal to all ages, races and genders across Pennsylvania and beyond. Our goal is to be viewed as a vibrant cornerstone to the cultural, economic, social and environmental life of communities near and far.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/farnsworth-house.jpeg
Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ned-smith-center-for-nature-and-art.jpeg
Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art in 2025.

Incident History — Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/farnsworth-house.jpeg
Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ned-smith-center-for-nature-and-art.jpeg
Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site company.

In the current year, Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company and Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company nor Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company nor Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company nor Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site company nor Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site nor Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site company nor Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company employs more people globally than Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site nor Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site nor Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site nor Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site nor Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site nor Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site nor Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X