Comparison Overview

Farnsworth Art Museum

VS

Tulsa Garden Center

Farnsworth Art Museum

16 Museum St, Rockland, 04841, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.farnsworthmuseum.org

The Farnsworth Art Museum offers a nationally recognized collection of works from many of America’s greatest artists. With more than 15,000 works in the collection, there is always something new on view at the Farnsworth. The museum has one of the nation’s largest collections of works by sculptor Louise Nevelson. The Museum has an extensive collection of Maine works by three generations of Wyeths—N.C., Andrew and Jamie—and in a unique partnership with the Wyeth Center for American Art and the Brandywine Museum, has access to more than 7,000 Wyeth works of art.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Tulsa Garden Center

undefined, Tulsa, undefined, undefined, us
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tulsagardencenter.org

Tulsa Garden Center, located in historic Woodward Park, is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to provide a variety of horticultural and environmental education opportunities for the community and to serve as horticultural headquarters for the Tulsa area. A primary goal is to promote learning about plants through educational and recreational programs, while preserving the heritage of its historic building. Tulsa Garden Center fulfills its role as part of a larger botanical community by advocating responsible stewardship of plants and their habitats and frequently sponsors lectures, classes, shows and special events. Nearly 30 affiliated organizations call Tulsa Garden Center home for horticultural and environmental activities. The Center is open to the public with no admission charge on Tuesday - Saturday, 9:00 am until 4:00pm.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/farnsworth-art-museum.jpeg
Farnsworth Art Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tulsa-garden-center.jpeg
Tulsa Garden Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Farnsworth Art Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tulsa Garden Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Farnsworth Art Museum in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tulsa Garden Center in 2025.

Incident History — Farnsworth Art Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Farnsworth Art Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tulsa Garden Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tulsa Garden Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/farnsworth-art-museum.jpeg
Farnsworth Art Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tulsa-garden-center.jpeg
Tulsa Garden Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Tulsa Garden Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Farnsworth Art Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tulsa Garden Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Farnsworth Art Museum company.

In the current year, Tulsa Garden Center company and Farnsworth Art Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tulsa Garden Center company nor Farnsworth Art Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tulsa Garden Center company nor Farnsworth Art Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tulsa Garden Center company nor Farnsworth Art Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Farnsworth Art Museum company nor Tulsa Garden Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Farnsworth Art Museum nor Tulsa Garden Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Farnsworth Art Museum company nor Tulsa Garden Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Farnsworth Art Museum company employs more people globally than Tulsa Garden Center company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Farnsworth Art Museum nor Tulsa Garden Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Farnsworth Art Museum nor Tulsa Garden Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Farnsworth Art Museum nor Tulsa Garden Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Farnsworth Art Museum nor Tulsa Garden Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Farnsworth Art Museum nor Tulsa Garden Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Farnsworth Art Museum nor Tulsa Garden Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References