Comparison Overview

Farmers Insurance

VS

Porto

Farmers Insurance

6301 Owensmouth Ave, None, Woodland Hills, CA, US, 91367
Last Update: 2025-11-23

The companies comprising the Farmers Insurance Group of Companies® currently make up one of the country's largest insurers of vehicles, homes and small businesses, and provide a wide range of other specialty insurance and financial services products. In business since 1928, today at Farmers® we proudly serve more than 10 million households with more than 19 million individual insurance policies across all 50 states through the efforts of nearly 48,000 exclusive and independent agents and approximately 21,000 employees. Our experience provides a rich history and legacy of service and strong customer relationships, while our focus on smart innovation, technology and entrepreneurship helps us to stay creative, to continually improve our product offerings and to drive the evolution of the insurance industry. Farmers Insurance Exchange®, the largest of the three primary insurance insurers that make up Farmers Insurance, is recognized as one of the largest U.S. companies on the 2017 Fortune 500 list. At Farmers®, we understand that every encounter with customers is an opportunity to differentiate ourselves with our personalized service and have an overall positive impact on their lives. We pride ourselves on helping the individuals and businesses we serve become smarter and better prepared to protect the things that matter most to them. We are also deeply committed to giving back. The Farmers culture is built around opportunities to volunteer and help improve the communities in which we work and live.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 44,315
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
1

Porto

Avenida Rio Branco, 1489, None, Sao Paulo, SP, BR, 01205-001
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 600 and 649

A Porto é mais que uma seguradora, é um ecossistema de soluções de serviços de proteção com tecnologia embarcada, para melhorar e facilitar a experiência do cliente. Com mais de 70 anos de mercado, a atuação da companhia se concentra hoje em quatro pilares estratégicos de negócio: Seguros, Saúde, Produtos Financeiros e Serviços. Além de 15.8 milhões de clientes únicos, 13 mil funcionários, 12 mil prestadores e 35 mil corretores parceiros, a empresa conta ainda com 101 sucursais e escritórios regionais em todo o Brasil. Ao todo 27 empresas fazem parte do universo Porto – entre elas: Porto Bank, Porto Saúde, Porto Seguro, Porto Serviço, Porto Seguro Uruguai, Azul Seguros, Itaú Seguros de Auto e Residência.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 22,676
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/farmers-insurance.jpeg
Farmers Insurance
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/porto.jpeg
Porto
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Farmers Insurance
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Porto
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

Farmers Insurance has 347.76% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

Porto has 198.51% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Farmers Insurance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Farmers Insurance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Porto (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Porto cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/farmers-insurance.jpeg
Farmers Insurance
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: phishing emails, exploited software vulnerabilities (Salesforce), credential harvesting
Motivation: financial gain, data theft for phishing/scams, potential espionage (agricultural data)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party vendor compromise (unauthorized database access)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party vendor compromise (Salesforce environment)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/porto.jpeg
Porto
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Porto company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Farmers Insurance company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Farmers Insurance company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Porto company.

In the current year, Farmers Insurance company has reported more cyber incidents than Porto company.

Porto company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Farmers Insurance company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Farmers Insurance company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Porto company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Porto company nor Farmers Insurance company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Farmers Insurance company nor Porto company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Farmers Insurance nor Porto holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Porto company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Farmers Insurance company.

Farmers Insurance company employs more people globally than Porto company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither Farmers Insurance nor Porto holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Farmers Insurance nor Porto holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Farmers Insurance nor Porto holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Farmers Insurance nor Porto holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Farmers Insurance nor Porto holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Farmers Insurance nor Porto holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H