Comparison Overview

Farmers Insurance

VS

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan

Farmers Insurance

6301 Owensmouth Ave, None, Woodland Hills, CA, US, 91367
Last Update: 2025-11-23

The companies comprising the Farmers Insurance Group of Companies® currently make up one of the country's largest insurers of vehicles, homes and small businesses, and provide a wide range of other specialty insurance and financial services products. In business since 1928, today at Farmers® we proudly serve more than 10 million households with more than 19 million individual insurance policies across all 50 states through the efforts of nearly 48,000 exclusive and independent agents and approximately 21,000 employees. Our experience provides a rich history and legacy of service and strong customer relationships, while our focus on smart innovation, technology and entrepreneurship helps us to stay creative, to continually improve our product offerings and to drive the evolution of the insurance industry. Farmers Insurance Exchange®, the largest of the three primary insurance insurers that make up Farmers Insurance, is recognized as one of the largest U.S. companies on the 2017 Fortune 500 list. At Farmers®, we understand that every encounter with customers is an opportunity to differentiate ourselves with our personalized service and have an overall positive impact on their lives. We pride ourselves on helping the individuals and businesses we serve become smarter and better prepared to protect the things that matter most to them. We are also deeply committed to giving back. The Farmers culture is built around opportunities to volunteer and help improve the communities in which we work and live.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 44,315
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
1

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan

600 E Lafayette Blvd, Detroit, Michigan, US, 48226
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan is a nonprofit corporation and an independent licensee of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association. BCBSM's commitment to Michigan is what differentiates it from other health insurance companies doing business in the state. That mission has never changed. Nearly 70 years ago, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan started with a purpose to provide people with the security of knowing they have health care when they need it. Today, that nonprofit mission is the same and the company is accomplishing it in many ways, including: Offering access to health care coverage for everyone, regardless of circumstances Never dropping your coverage for health reasons Partnering with the state to cover more than 32,000 children through MIChild Providing financial support to 30 free clinics statewide Contributing more money than any other company to provide Michigan with better health and health care Advocating and educating through Alliance for Advancing Nonprofit Health Care For more on the history of BCBSM, please visit our section on historical highlights: http://www.bcbsm.com/home/bcbsm/1930.shtml

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 10,379
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/farmers-insurance.jpeg
Farmers Insurance
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blue-cross-blue-shield-of-michigan.jpeg
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Farmers Insurance
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

Farmers Insurance has 347.76% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan in 2025.

Incident History — Farmers Insurance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Farmers Insurance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/farmers-insurance.jpeg
Farmers Insurance
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: phishing emails, exploited software vulnerabilities (Salesforce), credential harvesting
Motivation: financial gain, data theft for phishing/scams, potential espionage (agricultural data)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party vendor compromise (unauthorized database access)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party vendor compromise (Salesforce environment)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blue-cross-blue-shield-of-michigan.jpeg
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Farmers Insurance company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Farmers Insurance company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan company has not reported any.

In the current year, Farmers Insurance company has reported more cyber incidents than Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan company.

Neither Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan company nor Farmers Insurance company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Farmers Insurance company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan company nor Farmers Insurance company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Farmers Insurance company nor Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Farmers Insurance nor Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Farmers Insurance company.

Farmers Insurance company employs more people globally than Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither Farmers Insurance nor Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Farmers Insurance nor Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Farmers Insurance nor Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Farmers Insurance nor Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Farmers Insurance nor Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Farmers Insurance nor Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H