Comparison Overview

FANUC America Corporation

VS

Schneider Electric

FANUC America Corporation

3900 W. Hamlin, Rochester Hills, MI, 48309, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.fanucamerica.com

FANUC America offers the most complete range of industry-leading products and services for industrial robotics, CNC systems, and factory automation solutions. As a FANUC customer, you will find peace of mind knowing that your automation products are covered by FANUC’s ‘Service First’ guarantee: Lifetime maintenance on our products for as long as they are used - 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year. At FANUC America, we’re dedicated to increasing the competitiveness of manufacturers by creating opportunities to help them maximize efficiency, reliability, quality, and profitability. Whether you're a small or a large manufacturer, we have a solution that will meet your specific needs. We invite you to explore the possibilities with FANUC America's automation solutions - Please visit our website at https://www.fanucamerica.com.

NAICS: 33325
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 1,968
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Schneider Electric

35 Rue Joseph Monier, Rueil Malmaison, Paris, FR, 92506
Last Update: 2025-12-19
Between 700 and 749
https://www.se.com/

Schneider Electric is a global energy technology leader, driving efficiency and sustainability by electrifying, automating, and digitalizing industries, businesses, and homes. Its technologies enable buildings, data centers, factories, infrastructure, and grids to operate as open, interconnected ecosystems—enhancing performance, resilience, and sustainability. The portfolio includes intelligent devices, software-defined architectures, AI-powered systems, digital services, and expert advisory. With 160,000 employees and one million partners in over 100 countries, Schneider Electric is consistently ranked among the world’s most sustainable companies. www.se.com Follow us on: https://www.facebook.com/SchneiderElectric https://www.x.com/SchneiderElec https://www.x.com/SE_Careers https://www.instagram.com/schneiderelectric https://www.youtube.com/schneiderelectric https://www.tiktok.com/@schneiderelectric_global

NAICS: 33325
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 81,237
Subsidiaries: 20
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fanuc-america-corporation.jpeg
FANUC America Corporation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/schneider-electric.jpeg
Schneider Electric
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FANUC America Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Schneider Electric
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FANUC America Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Schneider Electric has 20.48% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — FANUC America Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FANUC America Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Schneider Electric (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Schneider Electric cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fanuc-america-corporation.jpeg
FANUC America Corporation
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2024
Type:Breach
Motivation: Political and Ethical Concerns
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/schneider-electric.jpeg
Schneider Electric
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Compromised Jira ticketing system
Motivation: Data theft, operational disruption
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: exploitation of zero-day vulnerability in MOVEit Transfer software
Motivation: financial extortion, data theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2013
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Human Error
Blog: Blog

FAQ

FANUC America Corporation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Schneider Electric company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Schneider Electric company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to FANUC America Corporation company.

In the current year, Schneider Electric company has reported more cyber incidents than FANUC America Corporation company.

Schneider Electric company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while FANUC America Corporation company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Schneider Electric company and FANUC America Corporation company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Schneider Electric company nor FANUC America Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FANUC America Corporation company nor Schneider Electric company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FANUC America Corporation nor Schneider Electric holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Schneider Electric company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to FANUC America Corporation company.

Schneider Electric company employs more people globally than FANUC America Corporation company, reflecting its scale as a Automation Machinery Manufacturing.

Neither FANUC America Corporation nor Schneider Electric holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FANUC America Corporation nor Schneider Electric holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FANUC America Corporation nor Schneider Electric holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FANUC America Corporation nor Schneider Electric holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FANUC America Corporation nor Schneider Electric holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FANUC America Corporation nor Schneider Electric holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Authorization (CWE-285) in Kibana can lead to privilege escalation (CAPEC-233) by allowing an authenticated user to bypass intended permission restrictions via a crafted HTTP request. This allows an attacker who lacks the live queries - read permission to successfully retrieve the list of live queries.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Weblate is a web based localization tool. In versions prior to 5.15.1, it was possible to overwrite Git configuration remotely and override some of its behavior. Version 5.15.1 fixes the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Elasticsearch can allow an authenticated user with snapshot restore privileges to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of memory and a denial of service (DoS) via crafted HTTP request.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can allow a low-privileged authenticated user to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of computing resources and a denial of service (DoS) of the Kibana process via a crafted HTTP request.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('Cross-site Scripting') (CWE-79) allows an unauthenticated user to embed a malicious script in content that will be served to web browsers causing cross-site scripting (XSS) (CAPEC-63) via a vulnerability a function handler in the Vega AST evaluator.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References