Comparison Overview

Brown Dutton & Crider Family Law

VS

Lexitas

Brown Dutton & Crider Family Law

1111 S Marietta Pkwy SE, Marietta, Georgia, 30060, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

We are a group of experienced attorneys with 30+ years of litigation experience and countless satisfied clients. We understand that family law is far more than just another legal matter. It affects your life, your children's lives, finances, and future.⁣ ⁣ Whether you are going through a divorce, a modification, or a custody case, you and your loved ones will always be our number one priority. At Brown, Dutton & Crider Family Law, we take pride in supporting our clients and guiding them through any challenges they are facing. Helping our customers improve their quality of life is why we do what we do. We walk with our clients every step of the way, from the start of their family law issue to the very end.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lexitas

13101 N.W. Freeway, Houston, Texas, 77040, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

For legal, insurance, and corporate leaders responsible for vital outcomes, Lexitas delivers highly responsive professional services paired with powerful technology to help move your practice, and your business, forward. Accuracy, timeliness, and reliability are the cornerstones of Lexitas service, which is why we are entrusted with mission imperative support functions by organizations of all sizes.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 759
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/familylawga.jpeg
Brown Dutton & Crider Family Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lexitas.jpeg
Lexitas
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Brown Dutton & Crider Family Law
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lexitas
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brown Dutton & Crider Family Law in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lexitas in 2025.

Incident History — Brown Dutton & Crider Family Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brown Dutton & Crider Family Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lexitas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lexitas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/familylawga.jpeg
Brown Dutton & Crider Family Law
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lexitas.jpeg
Lexitas
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lexitas company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Brown Dutton & Crider Family Law company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lexitas company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Brown Dutton & Crider Family Law company.

In the current year, Lexitas company and Brown Dutton & Crider Family Law company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lexitas company nor Brown Dutton & Crider Family Law company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lexitas company nor Brown Dutton & Crider Family Law company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lexitas company nor Brown Dutton & Crider Family Law company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Brown Dutton & Crider Family Law company nor Lexitas company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Brown Dutton & Crider Family Law nor Lexitas holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Brown Dutton & Crider Family Law company nor Lexitas company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lexitas company employs more people globally than Brown Dutton & Crider Family Law company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Brown Dutton & Crider Family Law nor Lexitas holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Brown Dutton & Crider Family Law nor Lexitas holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Brown Dutton & Crider Family Law nor Lexitas holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Brown Dutton & Crider Family Law nor Lexitas holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Brown Dutton & Crider Family Law nor Lexitas holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Brown Dutton & Crider Family Law nor Lexitas holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X