Comparison Overview

Family First Life USA

VS

Brunswick Private Client

Family First Life USA

5210 W Patrick Ln, None, Las Vegas, Nevada, US, 89118
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

We are always looking to grow the USA Life Agency team! There are no membership fees or contracts of any kind. We offer vested renewals from day one, warm leads, free training across the country, superior mentorship and carrier contract rates up to 145%! Our independent agents enjoy our hybrid sales system, the freedom of setting their own schedule and the opportunity to build their own business. We specialize in term and whole life insurance, mortgage protection, final expense, retirement planning through universal life policies and retirement protection through the use of fixed index annuities. We partner with multiple A-rated insurance carriers so our independent agents are able to meet all of their clients needs.

NAICS: 52421
NAICS Definition: Insurance Agencies and Brokerages
Employees: 193
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Brunswick Private Client

Cleveland, 44125, US
Last Update: 2026-01-01

As a third generation family-owned business, Brunswick Private Client takes a different approach for the unique families we serve. Our clients range from highly successful individuals and families, as well family offices to professional athletes, celebrities, and public figures. Although their backgrounds and stories are diverse, our clients all share one common goal = To protect their life’s work. Every client and family we serve receives our custom-tailored 5-step process, as we properly address the complexities and risks unique to each client. Our comprehensive partnership is a completely integrated approach toward personal risk management. Every step, from discovery to ongoing support is customized to address each client’s individual needs. We are so much more than a "broker" to our clients. Our hands-on concierge style adjusts as the needs of our clients change and evolve over their lifetime. Brunswick Private Client's growth over the last 50 years has been 100% referral based, recommendations from our current clients and through our complimentary P&C portfolio reviews in partnership with our HNW advisor network around the country. We take pride in going above and beyond for our clients to “Insure the world you love and everything in it!”™

NAICS: 52421
NAICS Definition: Insurance Agencies and Brokerages
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/familyfirstlifeusa.jpeg
Family First Life USA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brunswick-private-client.jpeg
Brunswick Private Client
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Family First Life USA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Brunswick Private Client
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Agencies and Brokerages Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Family First Life USA in 2026.

Incidents vs Insurance Agencies and Brokerages Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brunswick Private Client in 2026.

Incident History — Family First Life USA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Family First Life USA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Brunswick Private Client (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brunswick Private Client cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/familyfirstlifeusa.jpeg
Family First Life USA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brunswick-private-client.jpeg
Brunswick Private Client
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Family First Life USA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Brunswick Private Client company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Brunswick Private Client company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Family First Life USA company.

In the current year, Brunswick Private Client company and Family First Life USA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Brunswick Private Client company nor Family First Life USA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Brunswick Private Client company nor Family First Life USA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Brunswick Private Client company nor Family First Life USA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Family First Life USA company nor Brunswick Private Client company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Family First Life USA nor Brunswick Private Client holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Brunswick Private Client company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Family First Life USA company.

Neither Family First Life USA nor Brunswick Private Client holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Family First Life USA nor Brunswick Private Client holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Family First Life USA nor Brunswick Private Client holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Family First Life USA nor Brunswick Private Client holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Family First Life USA nor Brunswick Private Client holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Family First Life USA nor Brunswick Private Client holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N