Comparison Overview

Family Centered Services of Alaska

VS

Amarillo Family Institute

Family Centered Services of Alaska

1825 Marika Rd, Fairbanks, Alaska, 99709, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Family Centered Services of Alaska (FCSA) is a nationally accredited nonprofit 501(c) (3) corporation founded in 1989 and managed by a nine member board of directors. The original founders of the organization were community members with a diverse range of professional backgrounds committed to helping children with a wide spectrum of mental health disabilities. Today the organization provides individualized mental health and substance abuse treatment, and education services to children, young adults, and their families in the least restrictive setting possible. The top priority of the organization is to provide treatment and support to children and families so that they may have the opportunity to live happy and meaningful lives. The core value of FCSA as noted in our mission statement is "unconditional care" this is the basis for how services are delivered, how staff are trained, and how programs are designed. We strive to achieve our core foundational value by providing individualized services to children using a treatment plan that is inclusive of the child, family, nonprofessional and professional community members.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 72
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Amarillo Family Institute

4211 Interstate 40 West, Amarillo, Texas, 79106, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Amarillo Family Institute is a Marriage and Family based counseling service out of Amarillo, Texas, United States. Offices are located at 4211 Interstate 40 West Suite 101. Founded in 1994 and serving the five state area, a team of 12 therapists who specialize in treatment of addictions, affairs, grief, trauma, abuse, family and/or adolescent issues, spiritual concerns, depression, anxiety, as well as marital, couple, and relationship counseling. Please go to our website to review bios on individual therapists. The treatment team offers a full spectrum of modalities for whole-person care as well as nationally known marital intensives at thehideawayexperience.com serving couples from around the world.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/family-centered-services-of-alaska.jpeg
Family Centered Services of Alaska
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amarillo-family-institute.jpeg
Amarillo Family Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Family Centered Services of Alaska
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Amarillo Family Institute
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Family Centered Services of Alaska in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Amarillo Family Institute in 2026.

Incident History — Family Centered Services of Alaska (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Family Centered Services of Alaska cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Amarillo Family Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amarillo Family Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/family-centered-services-of-alaska.jpeg
Family Centered Services of Alaska
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amarillo-family-institute.jpeg
Amarillo Family Institute
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Family Centered Services of Alaska company and Amarillo Family Institute company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Amarillo Family Institute company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Family Centered Services of Alaska company.

In the current year, Amarillo Family Institute company and Family Centered Services of Alaska company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Amarillo Family Institute company nor Family Centered Services of Alaska company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Amarillo Family Institute company nor Family Centered Services of Alaska company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Amarillo Family Institute company nor Family Centered Services of Alaska company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Family Centered Services of Alaska company nor Amarillo Family Institute company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Family Centered Services of Alaska nor Amarillo Family Institute holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Family Centered Services of Alaska company nor Amarillo Family Institute company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Family Centered Services of Alaska company employs more people globally than Amarillo Family Institute company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Family Centered Services of Alaska nor Amarillo Family Institute holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Family Centered Services of Alaska nor Amarillo Family Institute holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Family Centered Services of Alaska nor Amarillo Family Institute holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Family Centered Services of Alaska nor Amarillo Family Institute holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Family Centered Services of Alaska nor Amarillo Family Institute holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Family Centered Services of Alaska nor Amarillo Family Institute holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N