Comparison Overview

FAMA by Vitro

VS

Boschung UK

FAMA by Vitro

Keramos 225, Col. Del Prado , Monterrey, 64410, MX
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

We at FAMA® transform our customers'​ productivity into utmost levels by bringing together best-in-class technology and a highly committed workforce. This allows us to form strategic partnerships to provide integral solutions for the Glass Containers, Automation solutions and Metal Mechanic industries. ​ As a subsidiary of Vitro®, the leading glass manufacturing Company in North America and one of the top companies in the world, FAMA is backed by more tan 100 years of experience in the industry.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 131
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Boschung UK

Ashbury, SN6 8LW, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

We are Boschung UK, the United Kingdom partner of the dynamic Swiss-based Boschung Group. Our engineering work incorporates clearing the roads and surfaces for the world’s largest airports, busiest highways and most visited cities and municipalities across the globe. We do this by offering a suite of trans-seasonal equipment that includes top of the range weather detection systems, snow removal vehicles, mobile and fixed de-icing technologies, powered by ELECTRIC multi-purpose carriers and road sweepers. We also have one of the most sophisticated centralized intelligent management digital platforms on the market. This platform can not only monitor all equipment it can also record any handmade field activities. Here at Boschung UK, we are committed to give the customer the right tools to keep their traffic surfaces safe and in operation all year-round with the most sustainable and automated processes, and in turn maximum efficiency. We work hard to make sure our customers are always our priority, and the standard of service you get from us will always exceed your expectations.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/famabyvitro.jpeg
FAMA by Vitro
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boschung-uk.jpeg
Boschung UK
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FAMA by Vitro
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Boschung UK
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FAMA by Vitro in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boschung UK in 2025.

Incident History — FAMA by Vitro (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FAMA by Vitro cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Boschung UK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boschung UK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/famabyvitro.jpeg
FAMA by Vitro
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boschung-uk.jpeg
Boschung UK
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

FAMA by Vitro company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Boschung UK company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Boschung UK company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to FAMA by Vitro company.

In the current year, Boschung UK company and FAMA by Vitro company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Boschung UK company nor FAMA by Vitro company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Boschung UK company nor FAMA by Vitro company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Boschung UK company nor FAMA by Vitro company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FAMA by Vitro company nor Boschung UK company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FAMA by Vitro nor Boschung UK holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

FAMA by Vitro company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Boschung UK company.

FAMA by Vitro company employs more people globally than Boschung UK company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither FAMA by Vitro nor Boschung UK holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FAMA by Vitro nor Boschung UK holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FAMA by Vitro nor Boschung UK holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FAMA by Vitro nor Boschung UK holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FAMA by Vitro nor Boschung UK holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FAMA by Vitro nor Boschung UK holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H