Comparison Overview

Fallas Automation

VS

Forbo Movement Systems

Fallas Automation

7000 Imperial Dr, Waco, TX 76712, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Fallas Automation is a case packaging equipment builder with the goal to make and deliver, on schedule, the best case packing machinery in terms of quality and value as perceived by our customers. We provide full systems from infeed conveyors to case sealers. That way you know you are getting a system that works. For over 40 years we've listened to your requirements for simple compact, lower-cost case packers and equipment. Here is the result: The kind of machines you'd build yourself if you had the time and resources

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 63
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Forbo Movement Systems

Lilienthalstrasse 6/8, Hanover, undefined, undefined, DE
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Forbo Movement Systems is the specialist for high-quality conveyor and processing belts, plastic modular belts, homogeneous conveyor belts, efficient power transmission belts as well as precise timing and flat belts. Our innovative solutions for production, material flow and logistics have played a decisive role in the competitiveness of our customers since 1919. Leading industrial companies all over the world therefore count on the technical expertise, service and support of Forbo Movement Systems in the development and implementation of future-oriented solutions for driving, conveying and manufacturing. In addition to our focus on quality and innovation, we are also committed to sustainability. Our own production is geared towards this, and our customers' systems also become more sustainable and ergonomic with products from Forbo Movement Systems.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 725
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fallas-automation.jpeg
Fallas Automation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/forbo-movement-systems.jpeg
Forbo Movement Systems
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fallas Automation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Forbo Movement Systems
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fallas Automation in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Forbo Movement Systems in 2025.

Incident History — Fallas Automation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fallas Automation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Forbo Movement Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Forbo Movement Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fallas-automation.jpeg
Fallas Automation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/forbo-movement-systems.jpeg
Forbo Movement Systems
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Forbo Movement Systems company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fallas Automation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Forbo Movement Systems company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fallas Automation company.

In the current year, Forbo Movement Systems company and Fallas Automation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Forbo Movement Systems company nor Fallas Automation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Forbo Movement Systems company nor Fallas Automation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Forbo Movement Systems company nor Fallas Automation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fallas Automation company nor Forbo Movement Systems company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fallas Automation nor Forbo Movement Systems holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Forbo Movement Systems company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Fallas Automation company.

Forbo Movement Systems company employs more people globally than Fallas Automation company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Fallas Automation nor Forbo Movement Systems holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fallas Automation nor Forbo Movement Systems holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fallas Automation nor Forbo Movement Systems holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fallas Automation nor Forbo Movement Systems holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fallas Automation nor Forbo Movement Systems holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fallas Automation nor Forbo Movement Systems holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H