Comparison Overview

Falabella

VS

Post Office Ltd

Falabella

Rosario Norte 660, Las Condes, Santiago Metropolitan Region, CL, 7561156
Last Update: 2025-12-15
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.falabella.com

Somos un espacio físico y digital que por más de 135 años ha inspirado y enriquecido la vida de nuestros clientes. Trabajamos con las mejores marcas del mundo para brindar una experiencia especialista omnicanal en vestuario, belleza, calzado, tecnología y hogar. Buscamos ser un espacio de encuentro entre nuestros clientes y las últimas tendencias del mundo. ​ ​ Más de 20 mil colaboradores en Chile, Perú y Colombia, atienden cada año a más de 16 millones de clientes en distintos puntos de contacto físico y digital entre tiendas de especialidad, sitios web y operaciones, donde se expresan y viven las mejores marcas del mundo.​ ​ Falabella te inspira con lo último primero.​

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 24,585
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Post Office Ltd

100 Wood Street, London, EC2V 7ER, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
https://www.postoffice.co.uk

We’ve come a long way since it all started over 380 years ago. We’ve built up a network of 11,500 branches across the country. To give you a sense of how big that is, we’ve got more branches than the four biggest banks in the UK put together. Or put simply, we’re the largest retail network in the UK. So we’re there for our customers, wherever they are. But our biggest branch by far is our website, which gets nearly 1 million visitors a week, so we’re building on our digital strategy too. As you can imagine, a business this big has lots of opportunities in lots of different areas. So we’re always looking out for enthusiastic, ambitious and customer-focused people to join us. And we’re striving to become “simpler to run, better for customers and a great place to work”, so innovation is really important. We’re confident the changes we make will be for the best, benefiting both our people and our customers. Social Media Policy: https://bit.ly/3gwSgEl

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 16,578
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/falabella-.jpeg
Falabella
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/post-office.jpeg
Post Office Ltd
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Falabella
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Post Office Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Falabella in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Post Office Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — Falabella (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Falabella cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Post Office Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Post Office Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/falabella-.jpeg
Falabella
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/post-office.jpeg
Post Office Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Falabella company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Post Office Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Post Office Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Falabella company.

In the current year, Post Office Ltd company and Falabella company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Post Office Ltd company nor Falabella company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Post Office Ltd company nor Falabella company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Post Office Ltd company nor Falabella company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Falabella company nor Post Office Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Falabella nor Post Office Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Falabella company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Post Office Ltd company.

Falabella company employs more people globally than Post Office Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither Falabella nor Post Office Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Falabella nor Post Office Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Falabella nor Post Office Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Falabella nor Post Office Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Falabella nor Post Office Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Falabella nor Post Office Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References