Comparison Overview

Falabella

VS

Circle K

Falabella

Rosario Norte 660, Las Condes, Santiago Metropolitan Region, CL, 7561156
Last Update: 2025-12-15
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.falabella.com

Somos un espacio físico y digital que por más de 135 años ha inspirado y enriquecido la vida de nuestros clientes. Trabajamos con las mejores marcas del mundo para brindar una experiencia especialista omnicanal en vestuario, belleza, calzado, tecnología y hogar. Buscamos ser un espacio de encuentro entre nuestros clientes y las últimas tendencias del mundo. ​ ​ Más de 20 mil colaboradores en Chile, Perú y Colombia, atienden cada año a más de 16 millones de clientes en distintos puntos de contacto físico y digital entre tiendas de especialidad, sitios web y operaciones, donde se expresan y viven las mejores marcas del mundo.​ ​ Falabella te inspira con lo último primero.​

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 24,585
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Circle K

4204, Boul. Industriel, Laval, Québec, CA, H7L 0E3
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.circlek.com/

Our mission at Circle K is to make our customers' lives a little easier every day. We are part of communities across North America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East, helping us grow into one of the world’s leading convenience and fuel retail businesses. Our parent company, Alimentation Couche-Tard (“Couche-Tard”), is a leader in the Canadian convenience store industry. Together, we are brightening journeys across more than 14,200 stores in 26 countries worldwide. We’re all about Growing Together. Learn how you can join our team today: https://workwithus.circlek.com. Work with us, and we’ll make it work for you. Find out more at https://www.circlek.com/ or connect with us on Facebook, Instagram, or Twitter.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 41,556
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/falabella-.jpeg
Falabella
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/circle-k.jpeg
Circle K
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Falabella
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Circle K
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Falabella in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Circle K in 2025.

Incident History — Falabella (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Falabella cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Circle K (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Circle K cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/falabella-.jpeg
Falabella
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/circle-k.jpeg
Circle K
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Falabella company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Circle K company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Circle K company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Falabella company has not reported any.

In the current year, Circle K company and Falabella company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Circle K company nor Falabella company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Circle K company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Falabella company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Circle K company nor Falabella company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Falabella company nor Circle K company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Falabella nor Circle K holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Falabella company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Circle K company.

Circle K company employs more people globally than Falabella company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither Falabella nor Circle K holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Falabella nor Circle K holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Falabella nor Circle K holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Falabella nor Circle K holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Falabella nor Circle K holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Falabella nor Circle K holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References