Comparison Overview

Falabella

VS

Axfood

Falabella

Rosario Norte 660, Las Condes, Santiago Metropolitan Region, CL, 7561156
Last Update: 2025-12-15
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.falabella.com

Somos un espacio físico y digital que por más de 135 años ha inspirado y enriquecido la vida de nuestros clientes. Trabajamos con las mejores marcas del mundo para brindar una experiencia especialista omnicanal en vestuario, belleza, calzado, tecnología y hogar. Buscamos ser un espacio de encuentro entre nuestros clientes y las últimas tendencias del mundo. ​ ​ Más de 20 mil colaboradores en Chile, Perú y Colombia, atienden cada año a más de 16 millones de clientes en distintos puntos de contacto físico y digital entre tiendas de especialidad, sitios web y operaciones, donde se expresan y viven las mejores marcas del mundo.​ ​ Falabella te inspira con lo último primero.​

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 24,585
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Axfood

Solnavägen 4 Stockholm, 113 65, SE
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
www.axfood.se

Axfood's purpose is to create more quality of life for everyone. Our family of companies includes the store chains Willys and Hemköp as well as Tempo, Handlar’n and Matöppet. B2B sales are handled through Snabbgross, and our support company Dagab is responsible for the Group’s product development, purchasing and logistics. The Axfood family also includes Urban Deli as well as the partly owned companies Apohem, Eurocash, and City Gross. We are proud of our private labels, where Garant, Eldorado and Minstingen are among the most popular brands. Axfood's success story would not be possible without our 13 000 employees with different backgrounds and experiences. Diversity makes us even better at meeting our customers' different wishes and needs. We are a large employer with good development opportunities and many places to make a difference. Challenge and shape Swedish food retail future by becoming an enabler at Axfood. Welcome to our family of opportunities!

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/falabella-.jpeg
Falabella
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/axfood.jpeg
Axfood
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Falabella
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Axfood
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Falabella in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Axfood in 2025.

Incident History — Falabella (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Falabella cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Axfood (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Axfood cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/falabella-.jpeg
Falabella
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/axfood.jpeg
Axfood
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Falabella company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Axfood company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Axfood company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Falabella company.

In the current year, Axfood company and Falabella company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Axfood company nor Falabella company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Axfood company nor Falabella company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Axfood company nor Falabella company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Falabella company nor Axfood company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Falabella nor Axfood holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Falabella company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Axfood company.

Falabella company employs more people globally than Axfood company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither Falabella nor Axfood holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Falabella nor Axfood holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Falabella nor Axfood holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Falabella nor Axfood holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Falabella nor Axfood holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Falabella nor Axfood holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References