Comparison Overview

Fake Door Films, LLC

VS

Woo Films

Fake Door Films, LLC

Los Angeles, US
Last Update: 2025-12-20

Fake Door Films is a narrative production company that strives to tell compelling stories that resonate with audiences. Utilizing our in-house expertise on the craft of filmmaking, Fake Door Films creates high-quality content on a minimal budget. Our team of producers, writers, cinematographers, sound designers, and music producers have honed their craft over the many years of working together and apart, establishing a unique and professional process to making great and memorable films.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Woo Films

undefined, Mexico City, Mexico City, 06700, MX
Last Update: 2025-12-20

Over the last 19 years, Woo Films has established itself as one of Mexico’s and Latin America’s most prolific and successful independent production companies. With prestigious films opening at the Cannes, Toronto, Venezia and San Sebastián Film Festivals, as well as consistent domestic box office success with our films featuring in the top 10 during five consecutive years. Since the arrival of the streaming era, Woo Films has produced several successful titles for local and global audiences. Woo Films began operations in 2005 in Mexico City, expanding to Madrid in 2021 and most recently to LA in 2024.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fakedoorfilms.jpeg
Fake Door Films, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mr-woo.jpeg
Woo Films
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fake Door Films, LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Woo Films
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Movies, Videos, and Sound Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fake Door Films, LLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Movies, Videos, and Sound Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Woo Films in 2025.

Incident History — Fake Door Films, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fake Door Films, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Woo Films (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Woo Films cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fakedoorfilms.jpeg
Fake Door Films, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mr-woo.jpeg
Woo Films
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fake Door Films, LLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Woo Films company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Woo Films company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fake Door Films, LLC company.

In the current year, Woo Films company and Fake Door Films, LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Woo Films company nor Fake Door Films, LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Woo Films company nor Fake Door Films, LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Woo Films company nor Fake Door Films, LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fake Door Films, LLC company nor Woo Films company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fake Door Films, LLC nor Woo Films holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fake Door Films, LLC company nor Woo Films company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Fake Door Films, LLC nor Woo Films holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fake Door Films, LLC nor Woo Films holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fake Door Films, LLC nor Woo Films holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fake Door Films, LLC nor Woo Films holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fake Door Films, LLC nor Woo Films holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fake Door Films, LLC nor Woo Films holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N