Comparison Overview

Fairsky Law Office

VS

Amara Legal Center

Fairsky Law Office

No. 24A JianGuoMenWai Avenue, Beijing, Beijing, 100022, CN
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

FAIRSKY is a law firm featuring IP services and commercial dispute resolution. Our leading professionals have profound knowledge and practical experiences, widely recognized by clients around the world. Our Vision In ancient Chinese dictionaries, 允 means FAITH and INTEGRITY, and 天 means THE TOP ABOVE ALL. 允天 Fairsky symbolizes our primary vision of adhering to the highest moral and professional standards, being faithful to clients and upholding client’s legitimate rights. What we do? We have strong prosecution and litigation practices in both patent and trademark fields. But besides being an IP agency, a litigation firm, we are more of an IP solution advisor for businesses. We help maximize the value of IP assets by building customized strategies for clients with various needs and at various sizes. Our Core Values Fairsky values clients equally. We customize our services to meet different needs and different budgets. We strive to provide cost-effective and business applicable solutions in a timely manner. Our one-point contact service mode ensures clients’ convenience and feeling at ease.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Amara Legal Center

P.O. Box 15255, Washington, DC, 20003, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The Amara Legal Center provides free legal services to individuals whose rights have been violated through either involvement in the adult services industry or are who survivors of human trafficking. Amara recognizes that these individuals face a common set of legal issues. We are committed to raising public awareness of the legal issues facing our clients, to connecting our clients with other vital social services, and to fighting tirelessly to provide excellent legal representation to all of our clients.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fairskylaw.jpeg
Fairsky Law Office
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fairsky Law Office
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Amara Legal Center
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fairsky Law Office in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Amara Legal Center in 2025.

Incident History — Fairsky Law Office (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fairsky Law Office cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Amara Legal Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amara Legal Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fairskylaw.jpeg
Fairsky Law Office
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-amara-legal-center.jpeg
Amara Legal Center
Incidents

FAQ

Fairsky Law Office company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Amara Legal Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Amara Legal Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fairsky Law Office company.

In the current year, Amara Legal Center company and Fairsky Law Office company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Amara Legal Center company nor Fairsky Law Office company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Amara Legal Center company nor Fairsky Law Office company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Amara Legal Center company nor Fairsky Law Office company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fairsky Law Office company nor Amara Legal Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fairsky Law Office nor Amara Legal Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fairsky Law Office company nor Amara Legal Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fairsky Law Office company employs more people globally than Amara Legal Center company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Fairsky Law Office nor Amara Legal Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fairsky Law Office nor Amara Legal Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fairsky Law Office nor Amara Legal Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fairsky Law Office nor Amara Legal Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fairsky Law Office nor Amara Legal Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fairsky Law Office nor Amara Legal Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X