Comparison Overview

Fairfield Memorial Hospital

VS

Atrium Health

Fairfield Memorial Hospital

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Excellence in Community Healthcare. Fairfield Memorial Hospital is a fully accredited, not-for-profit critical access hospital. The hospital has 25 acute-care beds and a workforce of over 250 employees. The medical staff at Fairfield Memorial Hospital is comprised of over 90 credentialed physicians and healthcare providers. Fairfield Memorial Hospital is accredited by The Joint Commission, which means that they voluntarily sought inspection by The Joint Commission to survey the quality of patient care, services, equipment, and facility. Our sole purpose is to provide excellence in healthcare to the communities we serve, and are committed to community health education, wellness, and preventive medicine. Fairfield Memorial Hospital provides dedicated doctors, caring nurses, and the most modern technology. We offer numerous services, including a 30-bed Skilled Care Unit, Home Health Services, 24-hour Emergency Care, Intensive Care Unit, Designated Comfort Care Rooms, Surgical Services, Diagnostic Imaging (CT Scanning, Ultrasound, Digital Mammography, PET-CT, Nuclear Medicine, Bone Density, MRI, General X-ray Procedures), Cardiac Rehabilitation, 24-hour Laboratory Services, Diabetes Education, Sleep Studies, Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Speech Language Pathology, Hydrotherapy, Industrial Rehabilitation and Respiratory Therapy. Fairfield Memorial Hospital’s acute care and intensive care units have all-private rooms, and the Skilled Care Unit has both private and semi-private rooms. Services provided in the Mattie B. Rinard Building and FMH Medical Arts Complex include DaVita Dialysis, FMH Senior Life Solutions (intensive outpatient geriatric psychiatric services), Heart care, Cancer Care Specialists, and Urology care. From pediatrics to seniors, Fairfield Memorial Hospital is dedicated to making you feel secure, knowing that you or your loved one will receive the best medical care possible by qualified and compassionate staff.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 206
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Atrium Health

1000 Blythe Blvd, Charlotte, North Carolina, US, 28203
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Atrium Health, part of Advocate Health, is redefining how, when and where care is delivered. We are rethinking methods of care delivery to reach more people and bringing human kindness to every step of their health journey. Our dedication to elevating health care for every individual, every teammate and every community is unwavering. We won't stop until everyone – no matter who they are or where they come from – has the possibility to live well. And because of this, we are redefining why we exist, our purpose as an organization and how we make it happen together as one.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 29,437
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fairfiled-memorial-hospital.jpeg
Fairfield Memorial Hospital
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atrium-health-us.jpeg
Atrium Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fairfield Memorial Hospital
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Atrium Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fairfield Memorial Hospital in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atrium Health in 2025.

Incident History — Fairfield Memorial Hospital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fairfield Memorial Hospital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Atrium Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atrium Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fairfiled-memorial-hospital.jpeg
Fairfield Memorial Hospital
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2024
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Motivation: Data theft and extortion
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atrium-health-us.jpeg
Atrium Health
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Atrium Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fairfield Memorial Hospital company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Fairfield Memorial Hospital company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Atrium Health company has not reported any.

In the current year, Atrium Health company and Fairfield Memorial Hospital company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Fairfield Memorial Hospital company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Atrium Health company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Atrium Health company nor Fairfield Memorial Hospital company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Atrium Health company nor Fairfield Memorial Hospital company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fairfield Memorial Hospital company nor Atrium Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fairfield Memorial Hospital nor Atrium Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fairfield Memorial Hospital company nor Atrium Health company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Atrium Health company employs more people globally than Fairfield Memorial Hospital company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Fairfield Memorial Hospital nor Atrium Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fairfield Memorial Hospital nor Atrium Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fairfield Memorial Hospital nor Atrium Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fairfield Memorial Hospital nor Atrium Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fairfield Memorial Hospital nor Atrium Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fairfield Memorial Hospital nor Atrium Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L