Comparison Overview

Fairfield University Art Museum

VS

Sulgrave Manor

Fairfield University Art Museum

200 Barlow Rd, Fairfield, Connecticut, 06824, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23

‌The Fairfield University Art Museum (FUAM) encompasses galleries for the permanent collection and rotating exhibitions in Bellarmine Hall, and the Walsh Gallery for larger special exhibitions in the Quick Center for the Arts. It is an essential academic and cultural resource that brings original works of art to the Fairfield University community, and to the residents of Fairfield County and beyond. The small but choice permanent collection features European and American paintings, drawings, prints and photographs, as well as a group of Asian, African and Pre-Columbian objects. This is augmented by antiquities and medieval objects on long-term loan from the Metropolitan Museum of Art, the Worcester Art Museum, and the American Numismatic Society, Asian art on loan from the Columbia University Collection, and European paintings and objects borrowed from private collections. Exhibitions showcase works of art in all media from a broad swathe of time periods and world cultures, ancient to contemporary. FUAM partners with local schools and cultural institutions and serves all audiences through outreach, free admission and free events.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sulgrave Manor

Manor Road, Banbury, OX15 4BY, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Welcome to Sulgrave Manor & Garden. Built by the ancestors of George Washington and saved from ruin by donors from both the UK and USA, Sulgrave Manor is the original home of the Special Relationship. Steeped in history with a legacy that unites nations, be inspired by our stories and consider why working together is still important today.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fairfield-university-art-museum.jpeg
Fairfield University Art Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sulgrave-manor.jpeg
Sulgrave Manor
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fairfield University Art Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sulgrave Manor
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fairfield University Art Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sulgrave Manor in 2026.

Incident History — Fairfield University Art Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fairfield University Art Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sulgrave Manor (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sulgrave Manor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fairfield-university-art-museum.jpeg
Fairfield University Art Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sulgrave-manor.jpeg
Sulgrave Manor
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sulgrave Manor company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fairfield University Art Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sulgrave Manor company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fairfield University Art Museum company.

In the current year, Sulgrave Manor company and Fairfield University Art Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sulgrave Manor company nor Fairfield University Art Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sulgrave Manor company nor Fairfield University Art Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sulgrave Manor company nor Fairfield University Art Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fairfield University Art Museum company nor Sulgrave Manor company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fairfield University Art Museum nor Sulgrave Manor holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fairfield University Art Museum company nor Sulgrave Manor company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sulgrave Manor company employs more people globally than Fairfield University Art Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Fairfield University Art Museum nor Sulgrave Manor holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fairfield University Art Museum nor Sulgrave Manor holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fairfield University Art Museum nor Sulgrave Manor holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fairfield University Art Museum nor Sulgrave Manor holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fairfield University Art Museum nor Sulgrave Manor holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fairfield University Art Museum nor Sulgrave Manor holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H