Comparison Overview

Technomet Enterprises

VS

Sterling Performance, Inc.

Technomet Enterprises

W-72, MIDC, Shiroli,, kolhapur, Maharashtra, 416122, IN
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

About us: Technomet Enterprises is the Regions only company that is a one-stop shop for all your foundry and engineering needs. We deal in Consumables, Raw Materials, Capital Equipments, Industrial Oils, Spares, and so on. We provide a cost-saving and customized solution that leads to the reduction of customer cost. We are known for technical support, service, and timely response. We have 5 branches across India that give our customers timely delivery. We are experts in taking care of the entire purchase outsourcing project of our customers that will add value to the business. We believe in excellence and continual improvement.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sterling Performance, Inc.

54420 Pontiac Trail, Milford, Michigan, 48381, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Performance Engines, Engine Rebuilding, Engine Development and Dynamometer Services for Marine, Automotive, Powerboats, Offshore Racing, Recreation, and Motor Sports. Complete Laboratory Testing Services -- ISO/IEC 17025 Accredited – Providing the following services: Fuel Systems Testing: Carbon Canister Testing, Component Testing, Fuel Slosh Testing, Pump Durability Testing. Environmental Testing and Simulation: Environmental Testing Chambers, Thermal Shock Testing, Vibration Testing and NVH Testing. Custom Testing: Custom Testing and Custom Test Equipment Building. Test Lab Services: Battery Testing, Engine Dynamometer Testing. Materials Testing: Magnetic Particle Inspection, Tensile Testing, Performance Testing, Reliability Testing, Salt Spray Testing & Corrosion Testing. Leak Detection: Helium Leak Testing, Evaporative Emission Testing / Permeation Testing.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fairdeal-&-technomet-enterprises.jpeg
Technomet Enterprises
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sterling-performance-inc..jpeg
Sterling Performance, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Technomet Enterprises
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sterling Performance, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Technomet Enterprises in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sterling Performance, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Technomet Enterprises (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Technomet Enterprises cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sterling Performance, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sterling Performance, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fairdeal-&-technomet-enterprises.jpeg
Technomet Enterprises
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sterling-performance-inc..jpeg
Sterling Performance, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Technomet Enterprises company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sterling Performance, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sterling Performance, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Technomet Enterprises company.

In the current year, Sterling Performance, Inc. company and Technomet Enterprises company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sterling Performance, Inc. company nor Technomet Enterprises company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sterling Performance, Inc. company nor Technomet Enterprises company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sterling Performance, Inc. company nor Technomet Enterprises company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Technomet Enterprises company nor Sterling Performance, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Technomet Enterprises nor Sterling Performance, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Technomet Enterprises company nor Sterling Performance, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Technomet Enterprises company employs more people globally than Sterling Performance, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Technomet Enterprises nor Sterling Performance, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Technomet Enterprises nor Sterling Performance, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Technomet Enterprises nor Sterling Performance, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Technomet Enterprises nor Sterling Performance, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Technomet Enterprises nor Sterling Performance, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Technomet Enterprises nor Sterling Performance, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H