Comparison Overview

Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden

VS

Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco

Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden

10901 Old Cutler Road, Miami, FL, 33156, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden is a 83 acre botanic garden located in Coral Gables, FL. Fairchild hosts various festivals, concerts and outdoor activities throughout the year. Fairchild is a leading center of palm research, horticulture, and conservation. In 2002, Fairchild launched The Fairchild Challenge - an environmental outreach program designed to promote environmental awareness, scholarship and stewardship in teenagers and pre-teens.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 127
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco

750 Kearny St., 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94108, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Chinese Culture Center, under the aegis of the Chinese Culture Foundation, is dedicated to elevating underserved communities and giving voice to equality through education and contemporary arts programming. We elevate Chinatown and other underserved communities by empowering youth and residents. Founded in 1965 and rooted in Chinatown, the Chinese Culture Center (or CCC) believes in a comprehensive community-building strategy that combines arts and education to create strong neighborhoods. Furthermore, we see Chinatown as a model of creativity and resilience for all underserved communities. We are a community-focused arts nonprofit. Our work is based in Chinatown and San Francisco's open and public spaces, and other art institutions. CCC’s activities include public art, contemporary exhibitions, and education programming. Over 150,000 members of the community engage with CCC annually. CCC is a proud partner of #StartSmall, the prestigious Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, San Francisco Foundation, Wells Fargo Foundation and the National Endowment for the Arts.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fairchild-tropical-botanic-garden.jpeg
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chinese-culture-center-of-san-francisco.jpeg
Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco in 2026.

Incident History — Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fairchild-tropical-botanic-garden.jpeg
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chinese-culture-center-of-san-francisco.jpeg
Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden company.

In the current year, Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco company and Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco company nor Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco company nor Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco company nor Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden company nor Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden nor Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden company nor Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden company employs more people globally than Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden nor Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden nor Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden nor Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden nor Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden nor Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden nor Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H