Comparison Overview

Fair Finance Institute

VS

Resources for the Future

Fair Finance Institute

Montpellierstraße 10, Heidelberg, 69115, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-05

The Fair Finance Institute (FaFin) is a not-for-profit think-and-do tank. It realises research projects for the socio-ecological transformation of the monetary and financial system in the most trans- and interdisciplinary way possible. It also provides information and training, produces publications and organises events. FaFin works at the interface between science, business, politics and civil society and develops solutions in cooperation with local, national and international organisations. FaFin is based in Heidelberg. And it has an office in Berlin. Our data privacy guidelines can be found under www.fair-finance-institute.de/privacy/ and our legal notice under www.fair-finance-institute.de/en/legal-notice/.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Resources for the Future

1616 P St. NW, Washington, DC, 20036, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

Resources for the Future improves environmental, energy, and natural resource decisions through impartial economic research and policy engagement. RFF is committed to being the most widely trusted source of research insights and policy solutions leading to a healthy environment and a thriving economy. RFF is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt nonprofit organization that operates according to four core values: BALANCE: RFF focuses on improving both environmental and economic outcomes. INDEPENDENCE: RFF is nonpartisan and its research is nonproprietary and publicly available. RIGOR: RFF adheres to the highest scientific and professional standards. RESULTS: RFF’s work leads to better decisions.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 142
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fair-finance-institute.jpeg
Fair Finance Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/resources-for-the-future.jpeg
Resources for the Future
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fair Finance Institute
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Resources for the Future
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fair Finance Institute in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Resources for the Future in 2025.

Incident History — Fair Finance Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fair Finance Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Resources for the Future (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Resources for the Future cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fair-finance-institute.jpeg
Fair Finance Institute
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/resources-for-the-future.jpeg
Resources for the Future
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Resources for the Future company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fair Finance Institute company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Resources for the Future company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fair Finance Institute company.

In the current year, Resources for the Future company and Fair Finance Institute company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Resources for the Future company nor Fair Finance Institute company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Resources for the Future company nor Fair Finance Institute company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Resources for the Future company nor Fair Finance Institute company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fair Finance Institute company nor Resources for the Future company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fair Finance Institute nor Resources for the Future holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fair Finance Institute company nor Resources for the Future company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Resources for the Future company employs more people globally than Fair Finance Institute company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Fair Finance Institute nor Resources for the Future holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fair Finance Institute nor Resources for the Future holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fair Finance Institute nor Resources for the Future holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fair Finance Institute nor Resources for the Future holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fair Finance Institute nor Resources for the Future holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fair Finance Institute nor Resources for the Future holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X