Comparison Overview

FactSet

VS

Absa Group

FactSet

43 Glover Ave, Norwalk, Connecticut, US, 06850
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.factset.com

FactSet creates flexible, open data and software solutions for tens of thousands of investment professionals around the world, providing instant access to financial data and analytics that investors use to make crucial decisions. For 40 years, through market changes and technological progress, our focus has always been to provide exceptional client service. From more than 60 offices in 23 countries, we’re all working together toward the goal of creating value for our clients, and we’re proud that 95% of asset managers who use FactSet continue to use FactSet, year after year. As big as we grow, as far as we reach, and as successful as we become, we stay connected to our clients and to each other.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 14,337
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Absa Group

7th Floor, Absa Towers West, 15 Troye Street, Johannesburg, Johannesburg, ZA, 2001
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
https://www.absa.africa/your-story-matters/

Absa Group Limited (Absa) has forged a new way of getting things done, driven by bravery and passion, with the readiness to realise growth on the African continent and beyond. We’re a truly African brand, inspired by the people we serve in Botswana, Ghana, Kenya, Mauritius, Mozambique, Seychelles, South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zambia. We also have representative offices in China, Namibia, Nigeria and the United States, as well as securities entities in the United Kingdom and the United States, along with technology support colleagues in the Czech Republic.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 41,482
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/factset.jpeg
FactSet
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/absa.jpeg
Absa Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FactSet
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Absa Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FactSet in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Absa Group in 2025.

Incident History — FactSet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FactSet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Absa Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Absa Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/factset.jpeg
FactSet
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/absa.jpeg
Absa Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

FactSet company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Absa Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Absa Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to FactSet company.

In the current year, Absa Group company and FactSet company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Absa Group company nor FactSet company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Absa Group company nor FactSet company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Absa Group company nor FactSet company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FactSet company nor Absa Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FactSet nor Absa Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Absa Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to FactSet company.

Absa Group company employs more people globally than FactSet company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither FactSet nor Absa Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FactSet nor Absa Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FactSet nor Absa Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FactSet nor Absa Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FactSet nor Absa Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FactSet nor Absa Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References