Comparison Overview

FactorLab, Inc.

VS

Mindtree

FactorLab, Inc.

6701 Koll Center Parkway, Pleasanton, CA, 94566, US
Last Update: 2026-03-10
Between 750 and 799

FactorLab designs, tests, and deploys innovative digital services that improve safety defenses and increase productivity in high risk workplaces. Our integrated application, SmartTagIt, is used by organizations to mitigate potential hazards; address human factor opportunities; engage field leaders; and bolster incident prevention systems. FactorWear is a wearable application that allows you to visualize the relationship between the physical requirements of a team, worksite constraints, and measurable outcomes, such as daily production and accident or injury rates.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Mindtree

Bangalore, India - New Jersey, USA, Bangalore, 560059, IN
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 800 and 849

LTIMindtree is a global technology consulting and digital solutions company that enables enterprises across industries to reimagine business models, accelerate innovation, and maximize growth by harnessing digital technologies. As a digital transformation partner to more than 700 clients, LTIMindtree brings extensive domain and technology expertise to help drive superior competitive differentiation, customer experiences, and business outcomes in a converging world. Powered by 86,000+ talented and entrepreneurial professionals across more than 30 countries, LTIMindtree — a Larsen & Toubro Group company — combines the industry-acclaimed strengths of erstwhile Larsen and Toubro Infotech and Mindtree in solving the most complex business challenges and delivering transformation at scale. LTIMindtree is proud to be an equal opportunity employer. We are committed to providing equal employment opportunities regardless of race, ethnicity, nationality, gender, gender identity, gender expression, language, age, sexual orientation, religion, marital status, veteran status, socio-economic status, disability, or any other characteristic protected by applicable law. Please note that neither LTIMindtree nor any of its authorized recruitment agencies/partners charge candidates any registration fees or other fees for appearing in interviews or securing employment/internships. Candidates are solely responsible for verifying the credentials of any agency or consultant claiming to work with LTIMindtree for recruitment purposes. Please note that anyone relying on representations made by fraudulent employment agencies/consultant does so at their own risk. LTIMindtree disclaims any liability for loss or damage suffered as a result of such actions. For more info, please visit ltimindtree.com.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 20,000
Subsidiaries: 14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/factorlab-inc-.jpeg
FactorLab, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mindtreeltd.jpeg
Mindtree
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FactorLab, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mindtree
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FactorLab, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mindtree in 2026.

Incident History — FactorLab, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FactorLab, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mindtree (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mindtree cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/factorlab-inc-.jpeg
FactorLab, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mindtreeltd.jpeg
Mindtree
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mindtree company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to FactorLab, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Mindtree company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to FactorLab, Inc. company.

In the current year, Mindtree company and FactorLab, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mindtree company nor FactorLab, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mindtree company nor FactorLab, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mindtree company nor FactorLab, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FactorLab, Inc. company nor Mindtree company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FactorLab, Inc. nor Mindtree holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Mindtree company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to FactorLab, Inc. company.

Mindtree company employs more people globally than FactorLab, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Information Technology & Services.

Neither FactorLab, Inc. nor Mindtree holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FactorLab, Inc. nor Mindtree holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FactorLab, Inc. nor Mindtree holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FactorLab, Inc. nor Mindtree holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FactorLab, Inc. nor Mindtree holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FactorLab, Inc. nor Mindtree holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H