Comparison Overview

Face to Face Germantown

VS

City Lore Inc

Face to Face Germantown

109 E Price Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19144, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.facetofacegermantown.org

At Face to Face struggling families, individuals and the homeless are welcomed and treated with dignity and respect. Our goal is to meet basic human needs and reduce suffering; thereby assisting our guests to a better future. Face to Face offers a Dining Room, a nurse managed Health Center, a Legal Center, a Social Services Center and Children’s Summer Camps and After School programs. We also have a Washeteria where people can take a hot shower and receive a new set of clothes. Face to Face serves 2,500 annually and has been a stable presence in Germantown for over 20 years. We are distinguished both by what we do and the manner in which we do it. Face to Face believes that each guest is the equal of each staff member and volunteer.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

City Lore Inc

56 East 1st Street, New York, New York, 10003, US
Last Update: 2026-01-19
Between 750 and 799
http://www.citylore.org

City Lore Inc is a non-profit art gallery and cultural hub that celebrates New York City's vibrant cultural atmosphere and provides a platform for the myriad voices that comprise the City. The gallery presents exhibitions and events on all the things that make New York "New York."​ Founded in 1986, City Lore is America's first organization focusing on urban folklore. City Lore works in four cultural domains—urban folklore and history, preservation, arts education and grassroots poetry traditions—and is committed to the principles of cultural equity and democracy.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/face-2-face-germantown.jpeg
Face to Face Germantown
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-lore-inc.jpeg
City Lore Inc
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Face to Face Germantown
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
City Lore Inc
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Face to Face Germantown in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City Lore Inc in 2026.

Incident History — Face to Face Germantown (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Face to Face Germantown cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — City Lore Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City Lore Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/face-2-face-germantown.jpeg
Face to Face Germantown
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-lore-inc.jpeg
City Lore Inc
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Face to Face Germantown company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to City Lore Inc company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, City Lore Inc company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Face to Face Germantown company.

In the current year, City Lore Inc company and Face to Face Germantown company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither City Lore Inc company nor Face to Face Germantown company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither City Lore Inc company nor Face to Face Germantown company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither City Lore Inc company nor Face to Face Germantown company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Face to Face Germantown company nor City Lore Inc company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Face to Face Germantown nor City Lore Inc holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Face to Face Germantown company nor City Lore Inc company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Face to Face Germantown company employs more people globally than City Lore Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Face to Face Germantown nor City Lore Inc holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Face to Face Germantown nor City Lore Inc holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Face to Face Germantown nor City Lore Inc holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Face to Face Germantown nor City Lore Inc holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Face to Face Germantown nor City Lore Inc holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Face to Face Germantown nor City Lore Inc holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References