Comparison Overview

Fabrizio & Brook, P.C.

VS

Beckman, Lieberman & Barandes, LLP

Fabrizio & Brook, P.C.

700 Tower Drive., Troy, Michigan, 48098, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Fabrizio & Brook is a full service law firm founded in 1972 to provide clients with proficient and specialized representation in all areas of transactional real property, creditor's rights, litigation and corporate law. The firm is dedicated to providing excellence in legal service throughout the State of Michigan. At Fabrizio & Brook we pride ourselves in developing close working relationships with our clients and partner with them in the pursuit of their goals. We employ experienced staff and management and rely on state of the art technology to drive the production of compliant and exceptional legal services. Our firm is managed by a leadership team comprised of experienced professionals who, along with attorney management, ensure exemplary performance in all of our internal and external systems and processes.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Beckman, Lieberman & Barandes, LLP

111 John St., New York, NY, 10038, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Beckman, Lieberman & Barandes, LLP was founded to meet the needs of clients in real estate, general corporate, securities, secured transactions and entertainment related matters. We believe that intimate, personal service is essential to effective representation. Our long-term relationships, with an array of highly valued clients, evidences the firm's commitment to excellence. Partners Robert Barandes, David Lieberman and Michael Beckman provide a breadth of experience and expertise that enables our boutique firm to advise clients on a wide range of matters. BLB uses innovative solutions and creative approaches to handle both domestic and foreign matters of nearly any size.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fabrizio-&-brook-p-c-.jpeg
Fabrizio & Brook, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beckman-lieberman-&-barandes-llp.jpeg
Beckman, Lieberman & Barandes, LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fabrizio & Brook, P.C.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Beckman, Lieberman & Barandes, LLP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fabrizio & Brook, P.C. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Beckman, Lieberman & Barandes, LLP in 2025.

Incident History — Fabrizio & Brook, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fabrizio & Brook, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Beckman, Lieberman & Barandes, LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Beckman, Lieberman & Barandes, LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fabrizio-&-brook-p-c-.jpeg
Fabrizio & Brook, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beckman-lieberman-&-barandes-llp.jpeg
Beckman, Lieberman & Barandes, LLP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Beckman, Lieberman & Barandes, LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fabrizio & Brook, P.C. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Beckman, Lieberman & Barandes, LLP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fabrizio & Brook, P.C. company.

In the current year, Beckman, Lieberman & Barandes, LLP company and Fabrizio & Brook, P.C. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Beckman, Lieberman & Barandes, LLP company nor Fabrizio & Brook, P.C. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Beckman, Lieberman & Barandes, LLP company nor Fabrizio & Brook, P.C. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Beckman, Lieberman & Barandes, LLP company nor Fabrizio & Brook, P.C. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fabrizio & Brook, P.C. company nor Beckman, Lieberman & Barandes, LLP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fabrizio & Brook, P.C. nor Beckman, Lieberman & Barandes, LLP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fabrizio & Brook, P.C. company nor Beckman, Lieberman & Barandes, LLP company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fabrizio & Brook, P.C. company employs more people globally than Beckman, Lieberman & Barandes, LLP company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Fabrizio & Brook, P.C. nor Beckman, Lieberman & Barandes, LLP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fabrizio & Brook, P.C. nor Beckman, Lieberman & Barandes, LLP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fabrizio & Brook, P.C. nor Beckman, Lieberman & Barandes, LLP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fabrizio & Brook, P.C. nor Beckman, Lieberman & Barandes, LLP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fabrizio & Brook, P.C. nor Beckman, Lieberman & Barandes, LLP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fabrizio & Brook, P.C. nor Beckman, Lieberman & Barandes, LLP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X