Comparison Overview

Faber and Faber

VS

Halldale Group

Faber and Faber

The Bindery, London, undefined, EC1N 8HN, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-25
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.faber.co.uk

Faber is one of the world’s great independent publishing houses. Since we were founded in 1929, poetry has been at the heart of our publishing, with T. S. Eliot as our first Poetry Editor. In every generation, Faber has sought to find the very best writers and we are proud to publish the foremost voices in fiction, non-fiction, poetry, drama, film and children’s books. Thirteen Nobel Laureates and six Booker Prize-winners have been published by Faber, with awards most recently for Kazuo Ishiguro and Anna Burns.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 195
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Halldale Group

735 Primera Blvd., Lake Mary, FL, 32746, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799
http://www.halldale.com/

Halldale Group is the world's only media company focused on techniques of modeling, simulation and training for aviation, defence and medical markets. Halldale helps communities to develop and share best practice in simulation technologies and training techniques and use them to improve safety and productivity. Halldale publishes three global magazines: - CAT Magazine, Civil Aviation Training Magazine - MS&T Magazine, Military Simulation & Training - Medical Training Magazine, a Journal for Healthcare Education, Simulation and Training Halldale also organises the world's three biggest conferences in civil aviation training: - WATS, the World Aviation Training Summit, - APATS, the Asia Pacific Airline Training Symposium and - EATS, the European Airline Training Symposium Halldale's website is a rich source of information on simulation and training, including a Simulation Training Directory, and detailed listings of flight simulators around the world updated as a monthly census.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/faber-and-faber.jpeg
Faber and Faber
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/halldale-media.jpeg
Halldale Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Faber and Faber
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Halldale Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Faber and Faber in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Halldale Group in 2025.

Incident History — Faber and Faber (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Faber and Faber cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Halldale Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Halldale Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/faber-and-faber.jpeg
Faber and Faber
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/halldale-media.jpeg
Halldale Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Faber and Faber company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Halldale Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Halldale Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Faber and Faber company.

In the current year, Halldale Group company and Faber and Faber company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Halldale Group company nor Faber and Faber company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Halldale Group company nor Faber and Faber company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Halldale Group company nor Faber and Faber company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Faber and Faber company nor Halldale Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Faber and Faber nor Halldale Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Halldale Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Faber and Faber company.

Faber and Faber company employs more people globally than Halldale Group company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Faber and Faber nor Halldale Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Faber and Faber nor Halldale Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Faber and Faber nor Halldale Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Faber and Faber nor Halldale Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Faber and Faber nor Halldale Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Faber and Faber nor Halldale Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References