Comparison Overview

EZAdsPro

VS

EPUBLIC Korea

EZAdsPro

5875 Castle Creek Parkway North Drive, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46250, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ezadspro.com

We direct our daily focus on the publishing industry to assist with developing, implementing, capturing and realizing new, creative ways to produce revenue and cost containment for their company. Through our understanding and direct connection with the newspaper industry, we can ensure what we develop are strategies, such as automation and effective managment tactics that are immediately beneficial to our clients. The team is comprised of advertising and technology professionals from the United States and the United Kingdom. This provides us with a great blend of individuals with a rich history in the industry and also a fresh outlook and a flow of creative and innovative ideas.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

EPUBLIC Korea

KR
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 800 and 849
http://www.epublic.co.kr

E*PUBLIC’s business can be classified into two large mainstream activities: import and distribution of ELT books and medical books. By signing an exclusive Korean distributorship agreement with Oxford University, E*PUBLIC has made continuing contributions to the improvement of English proficiency among Koreans. And, through an exclusive contract with the world’ s largest publisher of medical books, Elsevier, E*PUBLIC introduces new medical knowledge and textbooks to the general public as well as medical students in Korea.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ezadspro.jpeg
EZAdsPro
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
EPUBLIC Korea
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
EZAdsPro
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
EPUBLIC Korea
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EZAdsPro in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EPUBLIC Korea in 2025.

Incident History — EZAdsPro (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EZAdsPro cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — EPUBLIC Korea (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EPUBLIC Korea cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ezadspro.jpeg
EZAdsPro
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
EPUBLIC Korea
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

EPUBLIC Korea company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to EZAdsPro company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, EPUBLIC Korea company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to EZAdsPro company.

In the current year, EPUBLIC Korea company and EZAdsPro company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither EPUBLIC Korea company nor EZAdsPro company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither EPUBLIC Korea company nor EZAdsPro company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither EPUBLIC Korea company nor EZAdsPro company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither EZAdsPro company nor EPUBLIC Korea company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither EZAdsPro nor EPUBLIC Korea holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither EZAdsPro company nor EPUBLIC Korea company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

EPUBLIC Korea company employs more people globally than EZAdsPro company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither EZAdsPro nor EPUBLIC Korea holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither EZAdsPro nor EPUBLIC Korea holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither EZAdsPro nor EPUBLIC Korea holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither EZAdsPro nor EPUBLIC Korea holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither EZAdsPro nor EPUBLIC Korea holds HIPAA certification.

Neither EZAdsPro nor EPUBLIC Korea holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References