Comparison Overview

ExxonMobil

VS

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd

ExxonMobil

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 800 and 849

The need for energy is universal. That's why ExxonMobil scientists and engineers are pioneering new research and pursuing new technologies to reduce emissions while creating more efficient fuels. We're committed to responsibly meeting the world's energy needs. We aim to achieve #netzero emissions from our operated assets by 2050 (for Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions) and are taking a comprehensive approach to create emission-reduction roadmaps for major operated assets. Find us also on: YouTube.com/ExxonMobil Find our latest Privacy Policy at https://corporate.exxonmobil.com/Global-legal-pages/privacy-policy See our terms and conditions at https://corporate.exxonmobil.com/global-legal-pages/terms-and-conditions Find resources on our GHG emission reduction efforts here: https://corporate.exxonmobil.com/resources

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 61,842
Subsidiaries: 37
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd

5 Nelson Mandela Marg, Deendayal Urja Bhawan, New Delhi, Delhi, IN, 110070
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

Maharatna ONGC is the largest producer of crude oil and natural gas in India, contributing around 70 per cent of Indian domestic production. The crude oil is the raw material used by downstream companies like IOC, BPCL, HPCL to produce petroleum products like Petrol, Diesel, Kerosene, Naphtha, Cooking Gas-LPG. ONGC is India’s Top Energy Company and ranks 14th among global energy majors (Platts). It is the only Indian company to figure in Fortune’s ‘Most Admired Energy Companies’ list. ONGC ranks 226th overall in Forbes Global 2000. Acclaimed for its Corporate Governance practices, Transparency International has ranked ONGC 26th among the biggest publicly traded global giants. It is most valued public enterprise in India, and one of the highest profit-making and dividend-paying. ONGC has a unique distinction of being a company with in-house service capabilities in all areas of Exploration and Production of oil & gas and related oil-field services. Winner of the Best Employer award, a dedicated team of over 25,000 professionals toil round the clock in challenging locations. ONGC is an integrated energy company with interests in upstream, midstream and downstream sector of the hydrocarbon value chain, renewables, LNG, Power generation, petrochemicals and Value Added Products. ONGC's wholly-owned subsidiary Navratna ONGC Videsh Limited (OVL) is the biggest Indian multinational in the energy space, participating in 32 oil and gas properties in 15 countries. ONGC's subsidiary Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Limited (MRPL) is a Schedule ‘A’ Miniratna, with a single-location refining capacity of 15 million tons per annum. ONGC subsidiary HPCL is a Maharatna CPSE, and has the second largest share of product pipelines in India with a pipeline network of more than 3370 kms for transportation of petroleum products and a vast marketing network consisting of 14 Zonal offices and 133 Regional Offices.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 17,753
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exxonmobil.jpeg
ExxonMobil
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oilandnaturalgascorporation.jpeg
Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ExxonMobil
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ExxonMobil in 2025.

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd has 17.65% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — ExxonMobil (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ExxonMobil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exxonmobil.jpeg
ExxonMobil
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Breach
Motivation: To protect corporate interests amid environmental scrutiny
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oilandnaturalgascorporation.jpeg
Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Blog: Blog

FAQ

ExxonMobil company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

ExxonMobil and Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd company has reported more cyber incidents than ExxonMobil company.

Neither Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd company nor ExxonMobil company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

ExxonMobil company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd company nor ExxonMobil company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while ExxonMobil company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither ExxonMobil nor Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ExxonMobil company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd company.

ExxonMobil company employs more people globally than Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Oil and Gas.

Neither ExxonMobil nor Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ExxonMobil nor Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ExxonMobil nor Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ExxonMobil nor Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ExxonMobil nor Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ExxonMobil nor Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N