Comparison Overview

ExxonMobil

VS

ConocoPhillips

ExxonMobil

US
Last Update: 2026-01-20
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.exxonmobil.com

The need for energy is universal. That's why ExxonMobil scientists and engineers are pioneering new research and pursuing new technologies to reduce emissions while creating more efficient fuels. We're committed to responsibly meeting the world's energy needs. We aim to achieve #netzero emissions from our operated assets by 2050 (for Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions) and are taking a comprehensive approach to create emission-reduction roadmaps for major operated assets. Find us also on: YouTube.com/ExxonMobil Find our latest Privacy Policy at https://corporate.exxonmobil.com/Global-legal-pages/privacy-policy See our terms and conditions at https://corporate.exxonmobil.com/global-legal-pages/terms-and-conditions Find resources on our GHG emission reduction efforts here: https://corporate.exxonmobil.com/resources

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 66,908
Subsidiaries: 37
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

ConocoPhillips

925 N Eldridge Pkwy, Houston, 77079, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 800 and 849
https://www.conocophillips.com/?utm_source=LinkedIn&utm_medium=osocial&utm_campaign=profile&utm_content=visit_website

We are a global oil and gas company tasked with an important job—to safely find and deliver energy for the world. We’re experts in what we do—from the well site to the office. Across our operations and activities in 13 countries, we never forget our responsibility to be a great neighbor, and a great place to work. Guided by our SPIRIT Values—Safety, People, Integrity, Responsibility, Innovation and Teamwork—we deliver strong performance, keeping our promises to our stakeholders, communities and each other. We solve problems and develop new approaches together, as a team of people—not job titles. That’s ConocoPhillips. It’s not just what we do. It’s how we do it. At ConocoPhillips, we believe it is important to foster a safe and constructive online environment for our community. To do so, we encourage visitors to contribute to conversations by following a few guidelines: - Please contribute to the dialogue by keeping your comments relevant to the community and on topic. - Direct your comments at issues, rather than individuals. Any of the following violations of these guidelines may warrant, without prior notice, actions such as removing posts and comments or blocking an account: - Comments that are spam, defamatory or offensive (e.g., obscene, indecent, profane, violent, cruel or discriminatory) will be removed. - Content that violates the terms of use stipulated by each social media operating company. - Any other behavior ConocoPhillips deems inappropriate. Community policy: https://bit.ly/3mrTG4d

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 16,502
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exxonmobil.jpeg
ExxonMobil
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conocophillips.jpeg
ConocoPhillips
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ExxonMobil
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ConocoPhillips
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ExxonMobil in 2026.

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ConocoPhillips in 2026.

Incident History — ExxonMobil (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ExxonMobil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ConocoPhillips (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ConocoPhillips cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exxonmobil.jpeg
ExxonMobil
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Breach
Motivation: To protect corporate interests amid environmental scrutiny
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conocophillips.jpeg
ConocoPhillips
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ExxonMobil company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ConocoPhillips company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

ExxonMobil company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas ConocoPhillips company has not reported any.

In the current year, ConocoPhillips company and ExxonMobil company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ConocoPhillips company nor ExxonMobil company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

ExxonMobil company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other ConocoPhillips company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither ConocoPhillips company nor ExxonMobil company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ExxonMobil company nor ConocoPhillips company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ExxonMobil nor ConocoPhillips holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ExxonMobil company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to ConocoPhillips company.

ExxonMobil company employs more people globally than ConocoPhillips company, reflecting its scale as a Oil and Gas.

Neither ExxonMobil nor ConocoPhillips holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ExxonMobil nor ConocoPhillips holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ExxonMobil nor ConocoPhillips holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ExxonMobil nor ConocoPhillips holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ExxonMobil nor ConocoPhillips holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ExxonMobil nor ConocoPhillips holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References