Comparison Overview

Extra Co Group

VS

Martin Fluid Power (MFP Seals)

Extra Co Group

Industrial Area 2, Sharjah, AE
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Extra Co is a leading industrial manufacturer for thousands of different products, with more than 2,000 employees throughout the United Arab Emirates. Extra Co’s products and services have reached many parts of the world, including the Middle East, Africa, Europe, and the United States of America. Throughout its operations, Extra Co has adopted state-of-the-art manufacturing technologies and has pioneered new manufacturing methods to bring customer requirements to reality; all while maintaining the highest quality standards. Extra Co possesses several accreditations for its product ranges and operational procedures from the most globally acknowledged and reputed quality standards institutions. Extra Co’s has four major Business Units: The Fibreglass Composites Business Unit manufactures everything from standard fibreglass infrastructure products to specialized custom fibreglass products. The Prefab & Interiors Business Unit manufactures both standard and custom-designed prefab houses for temporary and permanent use, as well as complete interior fit-outs and carpentry work. The Precast Business Unit produces and installs standard and custom elements in GRC, gypsum, and concrete. The Metal Works Business Unit produces and erects all types of Steel Structures, designs and manufactures scaffolding systems, and supplies cut and bent steel reinforcement bars for the construction industry and manufactures steel profiles for structural and sheeting requirements.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 234
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Martin Fluid Power (MFP Seals)

900 E. Whitcomb Ave., Madison Heights, Michigan, 48071, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1977, Martin Fluid Power includes five distribution locations in the US, plus locations in England and Taiwan. MFP Seals represents a culmination of bringing together our Design, Engineering, Machining, Molding, Kitting, and Die Cutting departments. Today we are focused on designing, engineering and manufacturing, the highest quality seals, made in the USA. MFP Seals, a division of Martin Fluid Power, is focused on providing you superior service, an effortless experience and access to our sealing devices worldwide. Through our website, stocking locations and authorized distributors, our products are available wherever you are. The MFP Seals Manufacturing division encompasses our research, development, design, engineering, CNC machining, injection molding and die cutting departments. The focus of this division is to provide our customers with the highest level of engineered success, from initial plan to final production, throughout our product line. Whether we are working for a customer, enhancing the capability of an existing design, or engineering an entirely new seal, our team utilizes the latest technology to achieve the best results. Finite Element Analysis and state-of-the-art measuring systems are among the tools used to achieve the capabilities, tolerances and engineering accuracy our customers have come to expect from us.. The capability of a seal’s design is not only based on precision engineering, but also in the materials and machinery used to manufacture it. MFP Seals not only tests the compounds we use in the production of our seals, we also specially blend compounds to enhance specific properties based on the intended use of the product. From there we determine what type of manufacturing is necessary to achieve the optimal product. From start to finish, our goal is Sealing in Success™, the successful performance of our products, and the success of the businesses worldwide that depend on our products every day.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 71
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/extra-co-group.jpeg
Extra Co Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/martin-fluid-power.jpeg
Martin Fluid Power (MFP Seals)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Extra Co Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Martin Fluid Power (MFP Seals)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Extra Co Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Martin Fluid Power (MFP Seals) in 2025.

Incident History — Extra Co Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Extra Co Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Martin Fluid Power (MFP Seals) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Martin Fluid Power (MFP Seals) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/extra-co-group.jpeg
Extra Co Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/martin-fluid-power.jpeg
Martin Fluid Power (MFP Seals)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Extra Co Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Martin Fluid Power (MFP Seals) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Martin Fluid Power (MFP Seals) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Extra Co Group company.

In the current year, Martin Fluid Power (MFP Seals) company and Extra Co Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Martin Fluid Power (MFP Seals) company nor Extra Co Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Martin Fluid Power (MFP Seals) company nor Extra Co Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Martin Fluid Power (MFP Seals) company nor Extra Co Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Extra Co Group company nor Martin Fluid Power (MFP Seals) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Extra Co Group nor Martin Fluid Power (MFP Seals) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Extra Co Group company nor Martin Fluid Power (MFP Seals) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Extra Co Group company employs more people globally than Martin Fluid Power (MFP Seals) company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Extra Co Group nor Martin Fluid Power (MFP Seals) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Extra Co Group nor Martin Fluid Power (MFP Seals) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Extra Co Group nor Martin Fluid Power (MFP Seals) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Extra Co Group nor Martin Fluid Power (MFP Seals) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Extra Co Group nor Martin Fluid Power (MFP Seals) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Extra Co Group nor Martin Fluid Power (MFP Seals) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H