Comparison Overview

Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co.

VS

Donnachie Law

Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co.

1605 W Olympic Blvd, Los Angeles, California, 90015, US
Last Update: 2025-11-30
Between 750 and 799

Express Network provides complete legal support services to the most respected law firms in California and throughout the nation. Express Network has an experienced staff that specialize in a variety of services including: Court Services, Service of Process, Messenger, Unlawful Detainer, Collection, Writ, Levy and Records Retrieval, and Imaging Solutions Services. We are certified EFSP (Electronic Filing Service Provider) for Los Angeles Superior Court and all other courts that required e-filing. We are dedicated to putting the client's needs first and holding the highest standard of service within the industry. With offices throughout California, our staff is committed to providing efficient and reliable attorney and messenger services to our clients. With a network of reliable affiliates throughout the United States, Express Network is able to provide the best legal support services virtually anywhere. We have the knowledge and experience to assure the job is done right the first time.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Donnachie Law

5 Pleasance Court Dunfermline, KY12 0TD, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Donnachie Law is a court solicitors practice based in Dunfermline Fife. Started in 2013 by Paul Donnachie NP, Donnachie Law specialise in Accident Claims, Property Disputes, Family Law, Criminal Law, Unjustified Enrichment, Road Traffic Law, Contractual Disputes, Employment Law, Consumer Protection, Debt Recovery, Commercial & Consumer Disputes, and Professional Negligence Show more Show less

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/donnachie-law.jpeg
Donnachie Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co.
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Donnachie Law
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Donnachie Law in 2025.

Incident History — Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Donnachie Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Donnachie Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/express-network-legal-support-network-llc.jpeg
Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co.
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/donnachie-law.jpeg
Donnachie Law
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Donnachie Law company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Donnachie Law company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co. company.

In the current year, Donnachie Law company and Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Donnachie Law company nor Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Donnachie Law company nor Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Donnachie Law company nor Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co. company nor Donnachie Law company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co. nor Donnachie Law holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co. company nor Donnachie Law company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co. company employs more people globally than Donnachie Law company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co. nor Donnachie Law holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co. nor Donnachie Law holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co. nor Donnachie Law holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co. nor Donnachie Law holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co. nor Donnachie Law holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co. nor Donnachie Law holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X