Comparison Overview

Historic Mitchelville Freedom Park

VS

Hancock Shaker Village

Historic Mitchelville Freedom Park

539 William Hilton Pkwy, Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, US, 29926
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The Historic Mitchelville Freedom Park [HMFP], Inc. is a non-profit South Carolina corporation which was formed: To preserve, promote and honor Historic Mitchelville, the first self-governed town of formerly enslaved people in the United States. On November 7, 1861, Union forces attacked two Confederate forts and the Sea Islands of South Carolina near Port Royal. “The Battle of Port Royal” later drove the Confederate forces to retreat to the mainland. One island, Hilton Head Island, immediately became the headquarters for the Union Army. It also would become the setting for the first self-governed town of freed Africans in the country. After the Battle of Port Royal, men, women, and children fled the plantations and sought freedom with the Union army. Due to overcrowding in the barracks in the Union camp, General Ormsby Mitchel dedicated a large parcel of the land, near the old Drayton Plantation, to the newly freed Blacks that they would be able to cultivate and govern. Individuals and families were given a quarter acre lot and material to build a home. The freedmen elected their own officials, created their own system of law, built three churches, four stores and established the first compulsory school system in the state of South Carolina. Education was required for every child from age 6 to 15 and when the school district was created in 1866, there were 238 students in the town. Commercial organizations and churches were established and weddings were conducted. Men were recruited for the on-going Civil War and Black soldiers built nearby Fort Howell to protect Mitchelville. HMFP, in cooperation with the Town of Hilton Head and Beaufort County, endeavors to establish a cultural attraction in the historic Mitchelville area, that will include replicas of the historic homes, churches, stores and other structures that align with the themes that govern the interpretation of the site.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Hancock Shaker Village

None, None, None, None, US, 01202
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Hancock Shaker Village brings the Shaker story to life and preserves it for future generations. This is a place not only to preserve the Shakers’ story, but to find meaning in the Shakers’ beliefs and culture for our time. Hancock Shaker Village is a center for reflection on living a principled life in the 21st century. The Shakers, at their essence, are ordinary people who made an extraordinary choice to gather together in community in order to live a principled life. The values that the Shakers embraced—equality, nonviolence, community, sustainability, responsible land stewardship, innovation, simplicity, embodiment of a spiritual ideal, and quality in work - resonate for us today. We strive, in our programs and in our business practices to reflect these values. We utilize our site and our collections to help the public engage with contemporary thinking on these principles while learning about historical Shaker expression of these principles in their work, worship and community. The Village today consists of 20 historic buildings set amongst farm, field, meadow and woodland, and a collection of 22,200 objects. Each year visitors from around the world come to the Village to experience the City of Peace, participate in programs, view the Village's premier collection, and learn about Shaker life. The high quality of museum standards maintained by the Village is evidenced through its accreditation by the American Association of Museums. The Village is rated three stars by the Michelin Guide, a consistent Editor's Pick by Yankee Magazine's Travel Guide to New England, an AAA Gem, and has been selected as "Best of the Road" by Rand McNally. Hancock Shaker Village was designated a National Historic Landmark in 1968.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exploremitchelville.jpeg
Historic Mitchelville Freedom Park
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hancock-shaker-village.jpeg
Hancock Shaker Village
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Historic Mitchelville Freedom Park
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hancock Shaker Village
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Historic Mitchelville Freedom Park in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hancock Shaker Village in 2026.

Incident History — Historic Mitchelville Freedom Park (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Historic Mitchelville Freedom Park cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hancock Shaker Village (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hancock Shaker Village cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exploremitchelville.jpeg
Historic Mitchelville Freedom Park
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hancock-shaker-village.jpeg
Hancock Shaker Village
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hancock Shaker Village company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Historic Mitchelville Freedom Park company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Hancock Shaker Village company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Historic Mitchelville Freedom Park company.

In the current year, Hancock Shaker Village company and Historic Mitchelville Freedom Park company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hancock Shaker Village company nor Historic Mitchelville Freedom Park company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Hancock Shaker Village company nor Historic Mitchelville Freedom Park company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Hancock Shaker Village company nor Historic Mitchelville Freedom Park company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Historic Mitchelville Freedom Park company nor Hancock Shaker Village company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Historic Mitchelville Freedom Park nor Hancock Shaker Village holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Historic Mitchelville Freedom Park company nor Hancock Shaker Village company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hancock Shaker Village company employs more people globally than Historic Mitchelville Freedom Park company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Historic Mitchelville Freedom Park nor Hancock Shaker Village holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Historic Mitchelville Freedom Park nor Hancock Shaker Village holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Historic Mitchelville Freedom Park nor Hancock Shaker Village holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Historic Mitchelville Freedom Park nor Hancock Shaker Village holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Historic Mitchelville Freedom Park nor Hancock Shaker Village holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Historic Mitchelville Freedom Park nor Hancock Shaker Village holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H