Comparison Overview

Expleo Group

VS

Stefanini Brasil

Expleo Group

3 avenue des Prés, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, Saint Quentin en Yvelines, Ile-de-France, FR, 78180
Last Update: 2025-12-26
Between 750 and 799

Expleo is a global engineering, technology and consulting service provider that partners with leading organisations to guide them through their business transformation, helping them achieve operational excellence and future-proof their businesses. Expleo benefits from more than 50 years of experience developing complex products, optimising manufacturing processes, and ensuring the quality of information systems. Leveraging its deep sector knowledge and wide-ranging expertise in fields including AI engineering, digitalisation, hyper-automation, cybersecurity and data science, the group’s mission is to fast-track innovation through each step of the value chain. As a responsible and diverse organisation, Expleo is committed to doing business with integrity and working towards a more sustainable and secure society. Expleo boasts an extensive global footprint, powered by 18,000 highly-skilled experts delivering value in 29 countries and generating more than €1.4 billion in revenue.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 14,056
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Stefanini Brasil

AV JAGUARY 164, JAGUARIUNA, SP, JAGUARIUNA, BR
Last Update: 2025-12-25
Between 750 and 799

A Stefanini é uma multinacional brasileira que atua no setor de serviços em TI. Com um suporte em mais de 30 idiomas, a Stefanini, 5ª empresa mais internacionalizada, segundo a Fundação Dom Cabral, atua em mais de 35 países e e está entre as 100 maiores empresas de TI do mundo (BBC News). Uma das mais importantes provedoras globais de soluções de negócios baseadas em tecnologia oferece prestação de serviços em Consultoria, Integração, Desenvolvimento de Soluções, BPO, Outsourcing para Aplicativos e Infraestrutura, entre outras soluções.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 12,159
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/expleo-group.jpeg
Expleo Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stefanini-brasil.jpeg
Stefanini Brasil
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Expleo Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Stefanini Brasil
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Expleo Group in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stefanini Brasil in 2025.

Incident History — Expleo Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Expleo Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Stefanini Brasil (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stefanini Brasil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/expleo-group.jpeg
Expleo Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stefanini-brasil.jpeg
Stefanini Brasil
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Stefanini Brasil company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Expleo Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Stefanini Brasil company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Expleo Group company.

In the current year, Stefanini Brasil company and Expleo Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Stefanini Brasil company nor Expleo Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Stefanini Brasil company nor Expleo Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Stefanini Brasil company nor Expleo Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Expleo Group company nor Stefanini Brasil company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Expleo Group nor Stefanini Brasil holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Expleo Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Stefanini Brasil company.

Expleo Group company employs more people globally than Stefanini Brasil company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Expleo Group nor Stefanini Brasil holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Expleo Group nor Stefanini Brasil holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Expleo Group nor Stefanini Brasil holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Expleo Group nor Stefanini Brasil holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Expleo Group nor Stefanini Brasil holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Expleo Group nor Stefanini Brasil holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was found in Tenda WH450 1.0.0.18. Affected is an unknown function of the file /goform/PPTPUserSetting. Performing manipulation of the argument delno results in stack-based buffer overflow. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made public and could be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 7.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability has been found in Tenda WH450 1.0.0.18. This impacts an unknown function of the file /goform/PPTPServer. Such manipulation of the argument ip1 leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 7.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in omec-project UPF up to 2.1.3-dev. This affects the function handleSessionEstablishmentRequest of the file /pfcpiface/pfcpiface/messages_session.go of the component PFCP Session Establishment Request Handler. This manipulation causes null pointer dereference. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was detected in floooh sokol up to 16cbcc864012898793cd2bc57f802499a264ea40. The impacted element is the function _sg_pipeline_desc_defaults in the library sokol_gfx.h. The manipulation results in stack-based buffer overflow. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit is now public and may be used. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The patch is identified as 5d11344150973f15e16d3ec4ee7550a73fb995e0. It is advisable to implement a patch to correct this issue.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in PbootCMS up to 3.2.12. The affected element is the function get_user_ip of the file core/function/handle.php of the component Header Handler. The manipulation of the argument X-Forwarded-For leads to use of less trusted source. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X