Comparison Overview

eXL Legal, PLLC

VS

Best Hooper Lawyers

eXL Legal, PLLC

12425 28th Street N., St. Petersburg, Florida, 33716, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Providing Superior Legal Services to the Mortgage Servicing Industry At eXL Legal we pride ourselves on providing clients with exceptional legal representation though quality service and effective problem resolution. Our firm has grown in excess of 100 employees and attorneys and we continue to add quality attorneys and managers. eXL Legal prides itself on being a partner to its clients. Our clients have direct access to firm decision makers as well as its experienced attorneys. A large number of our attorneys have legal expertise in various aspects of default law and litigation, and when combined with our knowledgeable support team, allow us to provide effective and efficient representation to all of our clients. We are a full service firm excelling in default service management. Please reach out to Steve D. Tran at [email protected] to see if we can be of assistance to you.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Best Hooper Lawyers

10 Queen St, Level 12, Melbourne, Victoria, AU, 3000
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Best Hooper’s areas of expertise encompass planning and local government law, commercial and corporations law, dispute resolution and the legal aspects of property development. The synergies we derive from these core areas of practice together with our structure as a boutique firm enable our practitioners to remain accessible to our clients and offer timely and accurate legal services with comparatively cost effective fee structures. Our planning and local government lawyers advise on a range of areas, including the preparation of planning permit applications, section 173 agreements, applications for enforcement orders and prosecutions, liquor licensing, amendments to planning schemes and environmental law. They also advise in relation to restrictive covenants, easements, compulsory acquisitions and land compensation, and appeals against valuations in rates notices and land tax notices. Our dispute resolution team's focus includes corporation disputes, trade practices claims, contractual disputes, will disputes, partnership disputes, encroachment claims, adverse possession, trespass, administrative law, bankruptcy and insolvency matters, and professional and personal negligence claims. We also have expertise in sales and the purchase of real estate, land subdivision and property development, real estate leases and licences, company mergers and acquisitions, sale and purchase of businesses, finance and securities and partnerships and trusts.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exl-legal.jpeg
eXL Legal, PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/best-hooper-lawyers.jpeg
Best Hooper Lawyers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
eXL Legal, PLLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Best Hooper Lawyers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for eXL Legal, PLLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Best Hooper Lawyers in 2025.

Incident History — eXL Legal, PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

eXL Legal, PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Best Hooper Lawyers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Best Hooper Lawyers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exl-legal.jpeg
eXL Legal, PLLC
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/best-hooper-lawyers.jpeg
Best Hooper Lawyers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

eXL Legal, PLLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Best Hooper Lawyers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Best Hooper Lawyers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to eXL Legal, PLLC company.

In the current year, Best Hooper Lawyers company and eXL Legal, PLLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Best Hooper Lawyers company nor eXL Legal, PLLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Best Hooper Lawyers company nor eXL Legal, PLLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Best Hooper Lawyers company nor eXL Legal, PLLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither eXL Legal, PLLC company nor Best Hooper Lawyers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither eXL Legal, PLLC nor Best Hooper Lawyers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither eXL Legal, PLLC company nor Best Hooper Lawyers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Best Hooper Lawyers company employs more people globally than eXL Legal, PLLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither eXL Legal, PLLC nor Best Hooper Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither eXL Legal, PLLC nor Best Hooper Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither eXL Legal, PLLC nor Best Hooper Lawyers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither eXL Legal, PLLC nor Best Hooper Lawyers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither eXL Legal, PLLC nor Best Hooper Lawyers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither eXL Legal, PLLC nor Best Hooper Lawyers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X