Comparison Overview

Exigent Group Limited

VS

Crary Buchanan

Exigent Group Limited

118 Pall Mall, London, London, SW1Y 5ED, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

This page is now Morae. In November 2023, Morae doubled global capacity for managed legal solutions with it's strategic acquistion of Exigent Group Limited. The combined company becomes one of the legal industry’s largest, most experienced providers of technology and managed services. Following the recent merger with Exigent Group, Morae is now the go-to destination for comprehensive legal resources and vibrant community engagement. Join us on Morae's LinkedIn page for a dynamic platform where industry professionals come together to explore emerging trends, share best practices, and engage in thought-provoking discussions. We look forward to seeing you there as we continue to deliver top-notch legal insights and facilitate enriching conversations. https://www.linkedin.com/company/10151555/admin/feed/posts/ Thank you for your continued support, and we can't wait to connect with you on Morae's LinkedIn page! Warm regards, The Team at Morae

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 383
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Crary Buchanan

759 SW Federal Hwy Ste 106, Stuart, FL, 34994, US
Last Update: 2025-11-30
Between 750 and 799

Crary Buchanan, founded in 1927, is one of the oldest law firms on Florida's Treasure Coast. The firm's offices are located in Stuart and Port St. Lucie. We serve a broad range of individual and business clients in Martin, St. Lucie, Okeechobee, Palm Beach and Indian River Counties. Our breadth of legal experience and over 80 years of in-depth knowledge of our community enable Crary Buchanan attorneys to provide exceptional legal services to our clients.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exigent-global.jpeg
Exigent Group Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crary-buchanan-bowdish-bovie-beres-elder-&-williamson-chartered.jpeg
Crary Buchanan
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Exigent Group Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Crary Buchanan
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Exigent Group Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Crary Buchanan in 2025.

Incident History — Exigent Group Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Exigent Group Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Crary Buchanan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Crary Buchanan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exigent-global.jpeg
Exigent Group Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crary-buchanan-bowdish-bovie-beres-elder-&-williamson-chartered.jpeg
Crary Buchanan
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Exigent Group Limited company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Crary Buchanan company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Crary Buchanan company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Exigent Group Limited company.

In the current year, Crary Buchanan company and Exigent Group Limited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Crary Buchanan company nor Exigent Group Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Crary Buchanan company nor Exigent Group Limited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Crary Buchanan company nor Exigent Group Limited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Exigent Group Limited company nor Crary Buchanan company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Exigent Group Limited nor Crary Buchanan holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Exigent Group Limited company nor Crary Buchanan company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Exigent Group Limited company employs more people globally than Crary Buchanan company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Exigent Group Limited nor Crary Buchanan holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Exigent Group Limited nor Crary Buchanan holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Exigent Group Limited nor Crary Buchanan holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Exigent Group Limited nor Crary Buchanan holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Exigent Group Limited nor Crary Buchanan holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Exigent Group Limited nor Crary Buchanan holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X