Comparison Overview

Exercise Medicine Research Institute

VS

SMIA

Exercise Medicine Research Institute

270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, 6027, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Edith Cowan University’s Exercise Medicine Research Institute is a cross-disciplinary alliance of research centres and expertise with extensive national and international linkages. It is the first institute of its kind at an Australian University bringing together an expert team of researchers committed to improving community health and wellbeing. In partnership with national and international networks, it enhances collaboration and promotes a holistic approach to health and lifestyle. Our vision is for exercise to be a core component of medicine for complex and chronic conditions. Through world leading research, EMRI creates the knowledge to shift existing paradigms of medical care to improve patient outcomes. Exercise Medicine Research Institute is a pioneer in prescribing exercise to manage chronic disease. EMRI’s research has improved clinical management of patients with cancer and neurological disorders, providing WA patients with access to first-in-Australia technology and clinical exercise programs at the Institute’s Vario Health Clinic.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SMIA

Angers, 49000, FR
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Le SMIA (Service Médical Interentreprises de l’Anjou) est une association loi 1901 à but non lucratif, assurant la surveillance de l'état de santé des travailleurs des entreprises des arrondissements d’Angers et de Segré. Agréé par la DREETS des Pays de la Loire (Direction Régionale de l'Economie, de l'Emploi, du Travail et des Solidarités). Nos équipes interviennent sur trois axes majeurs qui constituent la base de notre offre de service : > la prévention des risques d'atteinte à la santé du fait du travail > le suivi individuel de l'état de santé du salarié > la prévention de la désinsertion professionnelle

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 212
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exercise-medicine.jpeg
Exercise Medicine Research Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/smia.jpeg
SMIA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Exercise Medicine Research Institute
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SMIA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Exercise Medicine Research Institute in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SMIA in 2025.

Incident History — Exercise Medicine Research Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Exercise Medicine Research Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SMIA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SMIA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exercise-medicine.jpeg
Exercise Medicine Research Institute
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/smia.jpeg
SMIA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SMIA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Exercise Medicine Research Institute company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, SMIA company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Exercise Medicine Research Institute company.

In the current year, SMIA company and Exercise Medicine Research Institute company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SMIA company nor Exercise Medicine Research Institute company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SMIA company nor Exercise Medicine Research Institute company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SMIA company nor Exercise Medicine Research Institute company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Exercise Medicine Research Institute company nor SMIA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Exercise Medicine Research Institute nor SMIA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Exercise Medicine Research Institute company nor SMIA company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

SMIA company employs more people globally than Exercise Medicine Research Institute company, reflecting its scale as a Health and Human Services.

Neither Exercise Medicine Research Institute nor SMIA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Exercise Medicine Research Institute nor SMIA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Exercise Medicine Research Institute nor SMIA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Exercise Medicine Research Institute nor SMIA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Exercise Medicine Research Institute nor SMIA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Exercise Medicine Research Institute nor SMIA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H