Comparison Overview

Exela Technologies

VS

Fujitsu Portugal

Exela Technologies

2701 E. Grauwyler Road, Irving, Texas , 75061, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Exela is a business process automation (BPA) leader, leveraging a global footprint and proprietary technology to provide digital transformation solutions enhancing quality, productivity, and end-user experience. With decades of expertise operating mission-critical processes, Exela serves a growing roster of more than 4,000 customers throughout 50 countries, including over 60% of the Fortune ® 100. With foundational technologies spanning information management, workflow automation, and integrated communications, Exela’s software and services include multi-industry department solution suites addressing finance, accounting, human capital management, and legal management, as well as industry-specific solutions for banking, healthcare, insurance, and public sectors. Through cloud-enabled platforms, built on a configurable stack of automation modules, and over 17,500 employees operating in 23 countries, Exela rapidly deploys integrated technology and operations as an end-to-end digital journey partner. Twitter: @ExelaTech Facebook: @exelatechnologies Instagram: @exelatechnologies Investor Site: https://investors.exelatech.com/

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 10,089
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fujitsu Portugal

Torre do Colombo Av. Colégio Militar Lisboa, PT
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

A Fujitsu é a companhia líder japonesa de tecnologias de informação e comunicação (TIC) disponibilizando um leque completo de produtos tecnológicos, soluções e serviços. Cerca de 132.000 colaboradores da Fujitsu prestam suporte a clientes em mais de 100 países. Utilizamos a nossa experiência e o poder das TIC para moldar o futuro da sociedade com os nossos clientes. A Fujitsu Limited (TSE: 6702) apresentou receitas consolidadas de 3,9 biliões de ienes (35 mil milhões de dólares) para o ano fiscal que terminou a 31 de Março de 2020. A Fujitsu é o maior empregador japonês em Portugal, contando com mais de 2.100 Colaboradores. Com sede em Lisboa e operações no Porto e em Braga, é uma das três maiores empresas tecnológicas do mundo. Em Portugal há 40 anos, a Fujitsu trabalha com as maiores organizações dos principais sectores de actividade: Administração Pública (asseguramos a Gestão Documental em 80% dos Ministérios e o nosso Service Desk responde a mais de 10 milhões de chamadas por ano), Retalho (somos lideres e os sistemas Fujitsu são responsáveis por mais de 400 milhões de transações por ano, em mais de 500 hipermercados e supermercados), Banca (estamos em mais de 1700 balcões, prestando suporte técnico a 20.000 utilizadores), Transportes (sistemas de bilhética inteligente emitem mais de 20 milhões de bilhetes por ano e representam 250.000 horas de voo por ano). A Fujitsu apostou em Portugal para localizar um dos seus Centros de Competências que emprega mais de 1900 colaboradores de mais de 60 nacionalidades diferentes. Garantimos o suporte a mais de 750 mil utilizadores ou dispositivos espalhados pelo globo, em 22 línguas.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exela-technologies.jpeg
Exela Technologies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fujitsuportugal.jpeg
Fujitsu Portugal
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Exela Technologies
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fujitsu Portugal
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Exela Technologies in 2025.

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fujitsu Portugal in 2025.

Incident History — Exela Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Exela Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fujitsu Portugal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fujitsu Portugal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exela-technologies.jpeg
Exela Technologies
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fujitsuportugal.jpeg
Fujitsu Portugal
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Fujitsu Portugal company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Exela Technologies company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Fujitsu Portugal company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Exela Technologies company has not reported any.

In the current year, Fujitsu Portugal company and Exela Technologies company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fujitsu Portugal company nor Exela Technologies company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Fujitsu Portugal company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Exela Technologies company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Fujitsu Portugal company nor Exela Technologies company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Exela Technologies company nor Fujitsu Portugal company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Exela Technologies nor Fujitsu Portugal holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Fujitsu Portugal company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Exela Technologies company.

Exela Technologies company employs more people globally than Fujitsu Portugal company, reflecting its scale as a Information Technology & Services.

Neither Exela Technologies nor Fujitsu Portugal holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Exela Technologies nor Fujitsu Portugal holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Exela Technologies nor Fujitsu Portugal holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Exela Technologies nor Fujitsu Portugal holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Exela Technologies nor Fujitsu Portugal holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Exela Technologies nor Fujitsu Portugal holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H