Comparison Overview

Executive Mental Health

VS

Red River Hospital

Executive Mental Health

11835 West Olympic Blvd, Los Angeles, 90064, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1996 by Dr. Ari Kalechstein, Executive Mental Health (EMH) is a provider of clinical psychology, psychiatry and neuropsychology services. EMH offers support for patients who experience a wide array of mental health conditions. The cornerstones of the reputation that EMH has earned within the medical community include quality of care, forging personal relationships with patients, responsiveness to individual patient needs, and a commitment to best practices when providing clinical care. Interested in working with EMH? Reach out to us at [email protected]. Looking for clinicians to support you, your family, or your facility? Write us at [email protected] EMH offers comprehensive neuropsychological evaluations and clinical psychology services in our Los Angeles outpatient clinic and has worked with over 250 acute and long-term care facilities across California and Nevada. Our group of clinicians is comprised of fellowship-trained neuropsychologists, psychiatrists, and clinical psychologists. Our goal is to assess and identify the individual needs of each patient, and to provide evidence-based, clinically-effective psychological interventions. Why Executive Mental Health? • Network: In addition to the Los Angeles home office, EMH has offered direct care to over 250 acute and skilled nursing facilities in California and Nevada. • Experience: EMH has completed over 40,000 neuropsychological evaluations and over 30,000 Telehealth sessions. • Training: Clinicians at EMH are fellowship trained, which means that they completed an intensive, two-year training program in order to earn their title. • Languages: The EMH team of clinicians can offer therapy in eleven languages, including English, Spanish, Mandarin, Taiwanese and more. • Insurance: Each of the clinicians at EMH is a Medicare-approved provider. Moreover, EMH clinicians are paneled with over 25 insurance companies.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Red River Hospital

1505 Eighth Street, Wichita Falls, TX, 76301, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

For over four decades the residents of North Texas and Southern Oklahoma have looked to Red River Hospital for treatment of behavioral health, substance abuse, and co-occurring disorders. Children, teens, adults, and seniors are all accepted into the multiple inpatient and outpatient program offered at the hospital. Red River Hospital is also the home of the Military Heroes Unit, which provides inpatient services to all branches of the military, both active duty and retired, for PTSD, major depression, generalized anxiety, sexual trauma, psychosis, dual diagnosis including chemical dependency, survival guilt, and maladjustment to military lifestyle to name a few. Some of the treatment modalities that are utilized for this demographic are REBT, CPT, CBT, PE, DBT, Seeking Safety, SMART Recovery, 12-Step Recovery, as well as Celebrate Recovery! If you or someone you know might need help for a mental health or substance abuse disorder, please call us right away and see if we are a good fit for care and recovery. ~Mental Health Treatment ~ Substance Abuse ~ Recovery ~ Detox ~ Outpatient & Inpatient Programs ~ Transportation Available ~ Phone Assessments ~ Care for Adolescents, Adults, Seniors and Military ~ PHP ~ IOP ~ Rehab ~ Counseling ~ Therapy ~ CBT ~ CPT ~ DBT ~ REBT ~

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 147
Subsidiaries: 71
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/executive-mental-health.jpeg
Executive Mental Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/red-river-hospital.jpeg
Red River Hospital
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Executive Mental Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Red River Hospital
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Executive Mental Health in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Red River Hospital in 2026.

Incident History — Executive Mental Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Executive Mental Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Red River Hospital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Red River Hospital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/executive-mental-health.jpeg
Executive Mental Health
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/red-river-hospital.jpeg
Red River Hospital
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Red River Hospital company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Executive Mental Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Red River Hospital company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Executive Mental Health company has not reported any.

In the current year, Red River Hospital company and Executive Mental Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Red River Hospital company nor Executive Mental Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Red River Hospital company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Executive Mental Health company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Red River Hospital company nor Executive Mental Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Executive Mental Health company nor Red River Hospital company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Executive Mental Health nor Red River Hospital holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Red River Hospital company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Executive Mental Health company.

Red River Hospital company employs more people globally than Executive Mental Health company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Executive Mental Health nor Red River Hospital holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Executive Mental Health nor Red River Hospital holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Executive Mental Health nor Red River Hospital holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Executive Mental Health nor Red River Hospital holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Executive Mental Health nor Red River Hospital holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Executive Mental Health nor Red River Hospital holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N