Comparison Overview

Excel Sports

VS

Racquetball Warehouse

Excel Sports

2045 32nd St, Boulder, CO, 80301, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Excel Sports opened its doors in 1988 with a vision to create a single resource where passionate cyclists can find all of the products, goods and services they require, to satisfy their needs. To this day, our original concept of offering top quality service, through hard-working and experienced staff, thoughtful purchasing and quick order fulfillment, remains the bedrock of our organization. Our single location rests in the foothills of Boulder, Colorado and houses our sales staff, purchasing, customer service, shipping/receiving teams and Service Center. Having our entire business exist in one facility allows us to operate with perfect synergy to provide our customers with the best possible service.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Racquetball Warehouse

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21

We specialize in racquetball and everything racquetball related. Customer service is our #1 priority and we always aim to make sure our customers are satisfied with their experience with our company. We are committed to growing the sport of racquetball and offer a number of educational resources including blog articles as well as instructional videos. Please check us out if you or anyone you know love racquetball as much as we do.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/excel-sports-boulder.jpeg
Excel Sports
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/racquetball-warehouse.jpeg
Racquetball Warehouse
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Excel Sports
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Racquetball Warehouse
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Excel Sports in 2025.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Racquetball Warehouse in 2025.

Incident History — Excel Sports (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Excel Sports cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Racquetball Warehouse (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Racquetball Warehouse cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/excel-sports-boulder.jpeg
Excel Sports
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/racquetball-warehouse.jpeg
Racquetball Warehouse
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Excel Sports company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Racquetball Warehouse company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Racquetball Warehouse company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Excel Sports company.

In the current year, Racquetball Warehouse company and Excel Sports company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Racquetball Warehouse company nor Excel Sports company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Racquetball Warehouse company nor Excel Sports company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Racquetball Warehouse company nor Excel Sports company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Excel Sports company nor Racquetball Warehouse company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Excel Sports nor Racquetball Warehouse holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Excel Sports company nor Racquetball Warehouse company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Excel Sports company employs more people globally than Racquetball Warehouse company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither Excel Sports nor Racquetball Warehouse holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Excel Sports nor Racquetball Warehouse holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Excel Sports nor Racquetball Warehouse holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Excel Sports nor Racquetball Warehouse holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Excel Sports nor Racquetball Warehouse holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Excel Sports nor Racquetball Warehouse holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H