Comparison Overview

EXARC

VS

ROMU

EXARC

Aloelaan 40A, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, 2316XT, NL
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

EXARC is the international ICOM Affiliated organisation of Archaeological Open-Air Museums and Experimental Archaeology. It is our aim to establish a high standard of both scientific research and public presentation. The idea of international exchange of knowledge, human resources, publications and facsimiles is to improve the quality of work for all associated members.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ROMU

Munkebro 2, Roskilde, 4000, DK
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Museumsorganisationen ROMU har sit udspring i Roskilde Museum, som blev etableret i 1929. ROMU udgøres i dag af Roskilde Museum, Frederikssund Museum, Lejre Museum, RAGNAROCK - museet for pop, rock og ungdomskultur, Lützhøfts Købmandsgård (herunder Håndværkemuseet), Sankt Laurentius, Tadre Mølle og Domkirkemuseet ved Roskilde Domkirke. ROMU er en statsanerkendt kulturhistorisk museumsorganisation, som bl.a. undersøger, indsamler og formidler kulturarven i Roskilde, Lejre, Frederikssund og Egedal kommuner, samt er et af 10 museer, der på landsplan, er blevet udpeget af Slots- og Kulturstyrelsen til at varetage tilsynet med landets fredede fortidsminder. ROMU forestår tilsynet i det centrale og vestlige Sjælland. Derudover har ROMU ledelsesansvaret for arbejdet med verdensarv i fondsorganisationen bag kulturarven ved Roskilde Domkirke. ROMU er arbejdsplads for omkring 100 højt specialiserede museumsansatte, fordelt på knap 60 årsværk.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 171
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exarc.jpeg
EXARC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museumskoncernen-romu.jpeg
ROMU
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
EXARC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ROMU
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EXARC in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ROMU in 2026.

Incident History — EXARC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EXARC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ROMU (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ROMU cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exarc.jpeg
EXARC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museumskoncernen-romu.jpeg
ROMU
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ROMU company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to EXARC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ROMU company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to EXARC company.

In the current year, ROMU company and EXARC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ROMU company nor EXARC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ROMU company nor EXARC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ROMU company nor EXARC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither EXARC company nor ROMU company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither EXARC nor ROMU holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither EXARC company nor ROMU company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ROMU company employs more people globally than EXARC company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither EXARC nor ROMU holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither EXARC nor ROMU holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither EXARC nor ROMU holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither EXARC nor ROMU holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither EXARC nor ROMU holds HIPAA certification.

Neither EXARC nor ROMU holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.