Comparison Overview

EXARC

VS

Eugene Science Center

EXARC

Aloelaan 40A, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, 2316XT, NL
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://exarc.net

EXARC is the international ICOM Affiliated organisation of Archaeological Open-Air Museums and Experimental Archaeology. It is our aim to establish a high standard of both scientific research and public presentation. The idea of international exchange of knowledge, human resources, publications and facsimiles is to improve the quality of work for all associated members.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Eugene Science Center

2300 Leo Harris Pkwy, Eugene, Oregon, 97401, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.eugenesciencecenter.org

Eugene Science Center is a hands-on science museum located in Alton Baker Park, a 400 acre park located in the heart of Eugene, Oregon. It has one of the largest planetariums in the entire Pacific Northwest and specializes in inquiry-based interactive exhibits and educational programming. Eugene Science Center strives to engage children, excite their curiosity, inspire them toward a lifelong love of learning about science, and empower them to use science and technology to improve their communities. It envisions empowered communities that foster scientific learning and innovation to help create a better world. It provides a variety of educational programming including interactive exhibits, planetarium shows and presentations, school and public programs, science camps, and special events. The science center primarily serves children ages 0 to 14 along with their families, teachers, and guardians.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exarc.jpeg
EXARC
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eugene-science-center.jpeg
Eugene Science Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
EXARC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Eugene Science Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EXARC in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eugene Science Center in 2026.

Incident History — EXARC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EXARC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Eugene Science Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eugene Science Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exarc.jpeg
EXARC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eugene-science-center.jpeg
Eugene Science Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Eugene Science Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to EXARC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Eugene Science Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to EXARC company.

In the current year, Eugene Science Center company and EXARC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Eugene Science Center company nor EXARC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Eugene Science Center company nor EXARC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Eugene Science Center company nor EXARC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither EXARC company nor Eugene Science Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither EXARC nor Eugene Science Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither EXARC company nor Eugene Science Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

EXARC company employs more people globally than Eugene Science Center company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither EXARC nor Eugene Science Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither EXARC nor Eugene Science Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither EXARC nor Eugene Science Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither EXARC nor Eugene Science Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither EXARC nor Eugene Science Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither EXARC nor Eugene Science Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References