Comparison Overview

EXARC

VS

Connecticut Museum of Culture and History

EXARC

Aloelaan 40A, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, 2316XT, NL
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://exarc.net

EXARC is the international ICOM Affiliated organisation of Archaeological Open-Air Museums and Experimental Archaeology. It is our aim to establish a high standard of both scientific research and public presentation. The idea of international exchange of knowledge, human resources, publications and facsimiles is to improve the quality of work for all associated members.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Connecticut Museum of Culture and History

1 Elizabeth St., Hartford, CT, 06105, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799
http://www.connecticutmuseum.org

The Connecticut Museum of Culture and History is the go-to-destination for those who want to gain a deeper understanding of Connecticut’s culture and history. Here you will learn more about the critical role Connecticut continues to play in American history — and about the many cultures living in the state today. Through collaborative interactive exhibitions and programs, rooted in our world-class collections, you will explore the resiliency of its diverse communities, the creativity of its cultures, and the impact of its innovations.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 51
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exarc.jpeg
EXARC
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/connecticut-historical-society.jpeg
Connecticut Museum of Culture and History
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
EXARC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Connecticut Museum of Culture and History
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EXARC in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Connecticut Museum of Culture and History in 2026.

Incident History — EXARC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EXARC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Connecticut Museum of Culture and History (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Connecticut Museum of Culture and History cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exarc.jpeg
EXARC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/connecticut-historical-society.jpeg
Connecticut Museum of Culture and History
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Connecticut Museum of Culture and History company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to EXARC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Connecticut Museum of Culture and History company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to EXARC company.

In the current year, Connecticut Museum of Culture and History company and EXARC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Connecticut Museum of Culture and History company nor EXARC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Connecticut Museum of Culture and History company nor EXARC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Connecticut Museum of Culture and History company nor EXARC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither EXARC company nor Connecticut Museum of Culture and History company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither EXARC nor Connecticut Museum of Culture and History holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither EXARC company nor Connecticut Museum of Culture and History company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Connecticut Museum of Culture and History company employs more people globally than EXARC company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither EXARC nor Connecticut Museum of Culture and History holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither EXARC nor Connecticut Museum of Culture and History holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither EXARC nor Connecticut Museum of Culture and History holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither EXARC nor Connecticut Museum of Culture and History holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither EXARC nor Connecticut Museum of Culture and History holds HIPAA certification.

Neither EXARC nor Connecticut Museum of Culture and History holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References