Comparison Overview

Example, Inc

VS

Google

Example, Inc

None
Last Update: 2025-12-25
Between 750 and 799

None

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Google

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, 94043, US
Last Update: 2025-12-24
Between 700 and 749

A problem isn't truly solved until it's solved for all. Googlers build products that help create opportunities for everyone, whether down the street or across the globe. Bring your insight, imagination and a healthy disregard for the impossible. Bring everything that makes you unique. Together, we can build for everyone. Check out our career opportunities at goo.gle/3DLEokh

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 326,311
Subsidiaries: 46
12-month incidents
10
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
5

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Example, Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/google.jpeg
Google
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Example, Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Google
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Example, Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Google has 1539.34% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Example, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Example, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Google (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Google cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Example, Inc
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: MOVEit file transfer system
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/google.jpeg
Google
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Email processing systems, Calendar invitation structures, Document files
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Email Spoofing, Messaging Platform (WhatsApp)
Motivation: Financial Gain (Fraudulent Services/Products) or Data Theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Prompt-injection technique through crafted HTML and CSS code
Motivation: Credential theft, social engineering
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Example, Inc company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Google company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Google company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Example, Inc company.

In the current year, Google company has reported more cyber incidents than Example, Inc company.

Google company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Example, Inc company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Google company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Example, Inc company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Google company and Example, Inc company have reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks.

Google company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Example, Inc company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Example, Inc nor Google holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Google company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Example, Inc company.

Neither Example, Inc nor Google holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Example, Inc nor Google holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Example, Inc nor Google holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Example, Inc nor Google holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Example, Inc nor Google holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Example, Inc nor Google holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in itsourcecode Online Frozen Foods Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /contact_us.php. This manipulation of the argument Name causes sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

C-Kermit (aka ckermit) through 10.0 Beta.12 (aka 416-beta12) before 244644d allows a remote Kermit system to overwrite files on the local system, or retrieve arbitrary files from the local system.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Telenium Online Web Application is vulnerable due to a Perl script that is called to load the login page. Due to improper input validation, an attacker can inject arbitrary Perl code through a crafted HTTP request, leading to remote code execution on the server.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Fujitsu / Fsas Technologies ETERNUS SF ACM/SC/Express (DX / AF Management Software) before 16.8-16.9.1 PA 2025-12, when collected maintenance data is accessible by a principal/authority other than ETERNUS SF Admin, allows an attacker to potentially affect system confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.6
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

ONLYOFFICE Docs before 9.2.1 allows XSS in the textarea of the comment editing form. This is related to DocumentServer.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N