Example Corp.
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 0 and 549
None
NAICS: 5412
NAICS Definition: Accounting, Tax Preparation, Bookkeeping, and Payroll Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
8
Attack type number
4
Comparison Overview
Example Corp.
VS
SW International
SW International
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
SW is a fast-expanding professional services network of experts in key locations around the world. As the only extensive international network with deep roots in Asia Pacific, we are the gateway between one of the world's largest economies and the rest of the globe. With our experience in navigating intricate local markets, we thrive on creating transnational growth opportunities for both our clients and our people. We are a global accounting and advisory network with over 12,000 people, including 640+ partners, in more than 102 offices across 19 regions, connecting and collaborating to take care of your needs locally, nationally and internationally. The revenues of the year of 2023 reached approximately USD 714.3 million. We are ranked 21st in terms of fee income and 18th in terms of total headcount among all top 30 networks globally according to the World Survey 2024 of International Accounting Bulletin (IAB).
NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Compliance Badges Comparison
Security & Compliance Standards Overview
Example Corp.
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
Not verified
GDPR
Not verified
PCI DSS
Not verified
HIPAA
Not verified
SW International
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
Not verified
GDPR
Not verified
PCI DSS
Not verified
HIPAA
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Example Corp.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SW International
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Accounting Industry Average (This Year)
Example Corp. has 13.64% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Accounting Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for SW International in 2025.
Incident History — Example Corp. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Example Corp. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Incident History — SW International (X = Date, Y = Severity)
SW International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Notable Incidents
Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company
FAQ
SW International company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Example Corp. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.
Example Corp. company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas SW International company has not reported any.
In the current year, Example Corp. company has reported more cyber incidents than SW International company.
Example Corp. company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while SW International company has not reported such incidents publicly.
Example Corp. company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other SW International company has not reported such incidents publicly.
Example Corp. company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while SW International company has not reported such incidents publicly.
Example Corp. company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while SW International company has not reported such incidents publicly.
Neither Example Corp. nor SW International holds any compliance certifications.
Neither company holds any compliance certifications.
Neither Example Corp. company nor SW International company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.
SW International company employs more people globally than Example Corp. company, reflecting its scale as a Accounting.
Neither Example Corp. nor SW International holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.
Neither Example Corp. nor SW International holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Neither Example Corp. nor SW International holds ISO 27001 certification.
Neither Example Corp. nor SW International holds PCI DSS certification.
Neither Example Corp. nor SW International holds HIPAA certification.
Neither Example Corp. nor SW International holds GDPR certification.
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/0276479e7d0e280e0f8d26fa567d3b7aa97a516f
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/05fe6686a97fa0bcd3cf157805b3612033f975bc
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/3240d856d942727372a705252f7c8c115394a41e
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/19.2.16
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/20.3.14
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/21.0.1
- https://github.com/angular/angular/security/advisories/GHSA-58c5-g7wp-6w37
Description
Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description
Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
