Example Company Inc
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 550 and 599
None
NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition: Other Information Services
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
4
Comparison Overview
Example Company Inc
VS
Springer Nature
Springer Nature
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
Be Part of Progress - together we bring greater understanding to the world Springer Nature is one of the leading publishers of research in the world. We publish the largest number of journals and books and are a pioneer in open research. Through our leading brands, trusted for more than 180 years, we provide technology-enabled products, platforms and services that help researchers to uncover new ideas and share their discoveries, health professionals to stay at the forefront of medical science, and educators to advance learning. We are proud to be part of progress, working together with the communities we serve to share knowledge and bring greater understanding to the world. Global key facts: Established for over 180 years Nearly 10,000 colleagues 200 offices in 45 countries on all continents World’s largest academic book publisher Publisher of Nature, the world’s most influential journal First company to publish more than 1 million Open Access articles Key brands and imprints: Springer Nature is home to some of the best-known names in research, health, educational and professional publishing. Every day, around the globe, our brands reach millions of people. Nature Springer BMC Palgrave Macmillan Apress Macmillan Education Scientific American Springer Health+ Springer Medizin Research Square J.B. Metzler BSL Adis
NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition: Other Information Services
Employees: 12,582
Subsidiaries: 31
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Compliance Badges Comparison
Security & Compliance Standards Overview
Example Company Inc
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
Not verified
GDPR
Not verified
PCI DSS
Not verified
HIPAA
Not verified
Springer Nature
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
Not verified
GDPR
Not verified
PCI DSS
Not verified
HIPAA
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Example Company Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Springer Nature
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Information Services Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Example Company Inc in 2025.
Incidents vs Information Services Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Springer Nature in 2025.
Incident History — Example Company Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Example Company Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Incident History — Springer Nature (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Springer Nature cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Notable Incidents
Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company
Example Company Inc
Incidents
Date Detected: 5/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: MOVEit breach
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
Date Detected: 3/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Network Vulnerability
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
Date Detected: 3/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Vulnerability Exploitation
Motivation: Unauthorized access and data exfiltration
Blog: Blog
Springer Nature
Incidents
No Incident
FAQ
Springer Nature company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Example Company Inc company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.
Example Company Inc company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Springer Nature company has not reported any.
In the current year, Springer Nature company and Example Company Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.
Example Company Inc company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Springer Nature company has not reported such incidents publicly.
Example Company Inc company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Springer Nature company has not reported such incidents publicly.
Example Company Inc company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Springer Nature company has not reported such incidents publicly.
Example Company Inc company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Springer Nature company has not reported such incidents publicly.
Neither Example Company Inc nor Springer Nature holds any compliance certifications.
Neither company holds any compliance certifications.
Springer Nature company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Example Company Inc company.
Springer Nature company employs more people globally than Example Company Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Information Services.
Neither Example Company Inc nor Springer Nature holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.
Neither Example Company Inc nor Springer Nature holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Neither Example Company Inc nor Springer Nature holds ISO 27001 certification.
Neither Example Company Inc nor Springer Nature holds PCI DSS certification.
Neither Example Company Inc nor Springer Nature holds HIPAA certification.
Neither Example Company Inc nor Springer Nature holds GDPR certification.
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/0276479e7d0e280e0f8d26fa567d3b7aa97a516f
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/05fe6686a97fa0bcd3cf157805b3612033f975bc
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/3240d856d942727372a705252f7c8c115394a41e
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/19.2.16
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/20.3.14
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/21.0.1
- https://github.com/angular/angular/security/advisories/GHSA-58c5-g7wp-6w37
Description
Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description
Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
