Comparison Overview

Example Company Inc

VS

Gartner

Example Company Inc

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 550 and 599

None

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition: Other Information Services
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
4

Gartner

56 Top Gallant Street, Stamford, CT, US, 06904
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

We deliver actionable, objective business and technology insights. Our expert guidance and tools enable faster, smarter decisions and stronger performance on an organization’s mission-critical priorities. Our unrivaled combination of business and technology insights steers clients toward the right decisions on the issues that matter most. As a $6.3 Billion company, with 21,000 associates, and a member of the S&P 500, we are an objective partner with 14,000 client enterprises in 90 countries and territories — across every major function, geography, industry and market sector — and boast 45+ years of experience providing insights and expert guidance to client enterprises worldwide. To learn more about how we guide the leaders who shape the world. visit gartner.com. Gartner, Inc. (NYSE: IT) Community guidelines: https://gtnr.it/3tceMrU C-level Insights of the Week LinkedIn Newsletter: https://gtnr.it/4c56S97

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition: Other Information Services
Employees: 23,224
Subsidiaries: 20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Example Company Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gartner.jpeg
Gartner
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Example Company Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gartner
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Example Company Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Information Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gartner in 2025.

Incident History — Example Company Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Example Company Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gartner (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gartner cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Example Company Inc
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: MOVEit breach
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Network Vulnerability
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Vulnerability Exploitation
Motivation: Unauthorized access and data exfiltration
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gartner.jpeg
Gartner
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gartner company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Example Company Inc company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Example Company Inc company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Gartner company has not reported any.

In the current year, Gartner company and Example Company Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Example Company Inc company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Gartner company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Example Company Inc company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Gartner company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Example Company Inc company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Gartner company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Example Company Inc company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Gartner company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Example Company Inc nor Gartner holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Gartner company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Example Company Inc company.

Gartner company employs more people globally than Example Company Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Information Services.

Neither Example Company Inc nor Gartner holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Example Company Inc nor Gartner holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Example Company Inc nor Gartner holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Example Company Inc nor Gartner holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Example Company Inc nor Gartner holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Example Company Inc nor Gartner holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H