Comparison Overview

Everware International

VS

Unicharm

Everware International

111 Halmar Cove, Georgetown, Texas 78628, US
Last Update: 2025-03-18 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900
https://everwarenow.com/

Strong

Founded in 2010 by Henry Liu, the owner of one of China's largest kitchenware manufacturing companies, Everware International manages several brands, including the award-winning Cangshan Cutlery Company and New Star Foodservice. In 2022, Everware International moved its operations from Southern California to Georgetown, Texas, to set up manufacturing and distribution facilities for Cangshan Cutlery Company, New Star Foodservice, and an upcoming made-in-the-USA brand!

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Unicharm

ไธ‰็”ฐ3-5-27 ไฝๅ‹ไธๅ‹•็”ฃไธ‰็”ฐใƒ„ใ‚คใƒณใƒ“ใƒซ่ฅฟ้คจ ๆธฏๅŒบ, ๆฑไบฌ้ƒฝ 108-8575, JP
Last Update: 2025-06-04 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900
http://www.unicharm.co.jp

Unicharm Corporation is a Japanese company that manufactures disposable hygiene products, household cleaning products, specializing in the manufacture of diapers for both babies and adult incontinence, feminine hygiene products and pet care products. The company has operations in 80 countries and is a market leader in Asia in baby and feminine care products. It holds the top share of diaper sales in China, Indonesia, Vietnam and Thailand.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Everware International
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unicharm-corporation.jpeg
Unicharm
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Everware International
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Unicharm
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Everware International in 2025.

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Unicharm in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Everware International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Everware International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Unicharm (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Unicharm cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Everware International
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unicharm-corporation.jpeg
Unicharm
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Everware International company and Unicharm company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Unicharm company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Everware International company.

In the current year, Unicharm company and Everware International company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Unicharm company nor Everware International company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Unicharm company nor Everware International company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Unicharm company nor Everware International company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Everware International company nor Unicharm company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Everware International company nor Unicharm company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Everware International company nor Unicharm company has publicly disclosed the exact number of their employees.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki Cargo extension allows SQL Injection.This issue affects MediaWiki Cargo extension: 1.39, 1.43, 1.44.

Published
Date
2025-10-17
Updated
Date
2025-10-17
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:N/AU:Y/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber
References
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki QuizGame extension allows Stored XSS.This issue affects MediaWiki QuizGame extension: 1.39, 1.43, 1.44.

Published
Date
2025-10-17
Updated
Date
2025-10-17
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:N/AU:N/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber
References
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki PollNY extension allows Stored XSS.This issue affects MediaWiki PollNY extension: 1.39, 1.43, 1.44.

Published
Date
2025-10-17
Updated
Date
2025-10-17
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:N/AU:N/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber
References
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki WebAuthn extension allows Stored XSS.This issue affects MediaWiki WebAuthn extension: 1.39, 1.43, 1.44.

Published
Date
2025-10-17
Updated
Date
2025-10-17
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:N/R:U/V:C/RE:L/U:Amber
References
Description

pyquokka is a framework for making data lakes work for time series. In versions 0.3.1 and prior, the FlightServer class directly uses pickle.loads() to deserialize action bodies received from Flight clients without any sanitization or validation in the do_action() method. The vulnerable code is located in pyquokka/flight.py at line 283 where arbitrary data from Flight clients is directly passed to pickle.loads(). When FlightServer is configured to listen on 0.0.0.0, this allows attackers across the entire network to perform arbitrary remote code execution by sending malicious pickled payloads through the set_configs action. Additional vulnerability points exist in the cache_garbage_collect, do_put, and do_get functions where pickle.loads is used to deserialize untrusted remote data.

Published
Date
2025-10-17
Updated
Date
2025-10-17
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References